Response of amputated rat limbs to fetal nerve tissue implants and direct current
- PMID: 6491811
- DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100020209
Response of amputated rat limbs to fetal nerve tissue implants and direct current
Abstract
We have previously shown that implanted fetal nerve tissue stimulates the regeneration of amputated chick limbs. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a similar phenomenon would occur in amputated rat limbs and if addition of applied direct current (DC) would affect this process. Thus, fetal nerve tissue was implanted into amputated stumps of 3-week-old rats; variable tissue regeneration was induced that was dependent on the age of the donor implant and the presence of applied DC. Twelve or 14 day fetal neural implants induced new accessory bones containing epiphyseal plates and marrow cavities and occasionally formed joint-like structures with the host humerus. Addition of DC to 12 day neural implants increased the number of new bones formed. Eighteen day neural tissue with applied DC did not induce new bone formation but stimulated the maximal elongation of the host humerus and outgrowth of nerve fibers to the cut surface. Implantation of fetal heart tissue or implantation of fetal neural tissue into unamputated limbs failed to induce new bone formation. Although true limb regeneration was not achieved, formation of new skeletal elements did occur and this effect was enhanced by applied DC.
Similar articles
-
The threshold quantity of nerve required to induce limb regeneration in the chick embryo.J Neurosci Res. 1984;12(4):623-32. doi: 10.1002/jnr.490120411. J Neurosci Res. 1984. PMID: 6512891
-
Effect of augmentation of nerve supply upon limb regeneration in the chick embryo.J Exp Zool. 1982 May 20;221(1):49-59. doi: 10.1002/jez.1402210108. J Exp Zool. 1982. PMID: 7097178
-
Effects of radius--ulna removal on forelimb regeneration in Xenopus laevis froglets.J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1984 Aug;82:9-24. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1984. PMID: 6491587
-
Peri-implant osteogenesis in health and osteoporosis.Micron. 2005;36(7-8):630-44. doi: 10.1016/j.micron.2005.07.008. Epub 2005 Sep 6. Micron. 2005. PMID: 16182543 Review.
-
Neural transplantation: an historical perspective.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1990 Winter;14(4):389-401. doi: 10.1016/s0149-7634(05)80061-2. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1990. PMID: 2287479 Review.
Cited by
-
Bioelectric signaling in regeneration: Mechanisms of ionic controls of growth and form.Dev Biol. 2018 Jan 15;433(2):177-189. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2017.08.032. Epub 2017 Dec 25. Dev Biol. 2018. PMID: 29291972 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Bioelectric mechanisms in regeneration: Unique aspects and future perspectives.Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2009 Jul;20(5):543-56. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2009.04.013. Epub 2009 May 3. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2009. PMID: 19406249 Free PMC article. Review.
-
BioDome regenerative sleeve for biochemical and biophysical stimulation of tissue regeneration.Med Eng Phys. 2010 Nov;32(9):1065-73. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2010.07.010. Epub 2010 Aug 13. Med Eng Phys. 2010. PMID: 20708956 Free PMC article.
-
Genome-wide analysis reveals conserved transcriptional responses downstream of resting potential change in Xenopus embryos, axolotl regeneration, and human mesenchymal cell differentiation.Regeneration (Oxf). 2015 Nov 26;3(1):3-25. doi: 10.1002/reg2.48. eCollection 2016 Feb. Regeneration (Oxf). 2015. PMID: 27499876 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources