Comparative Study
Perinatal outcome in monitored and unmonitored high-risk deliveries
- PMID: 649354
Item in Clipboard
Comparative Study
Perinatal outcome in monitored and unmonitored high-risk deliveries
Isr J Med Sci.
1978 Feb.
Abstract
The benefit of fetal heart rate monitoring was evaluated by comparing the perinatal outcome in 1.246 high-risk pregnancies and deliveries--554 monitored and 692 unmonitored. Intrapartum and early neonatal mortality were significantly lower in the monitored group (P less than 0.05). This study provides evidence that fetal heart rate monitoring improves the fetal outcome of high-risk deliveries.
Similar articles
-
Intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring in low-risk pregnancies.Obstet Gynecol. 1980 Sep;56(3):301-4. Obstet Gynecol. 1980. PMID: 7422168
-
Significance of exaggerated fetal heart rate accelerations during active labor.J Reprod Med. 1984 Sep;29(9):661-4. J Reprod Med. 1984. PMID: 6492032
-
Does centralized monitoring affect perinatal outcome?J Matern Fetal Med. 1997 Nov-Dec;6(6):317-9. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6661(199711/12)6:6<317::AID-MFM3>3.0.CO;2-R. J Matern Fetal Med. 1997. PMID: 9438212
-
Central fetal monitoring: effect on perinatal outcomes and cesarean section rate.Birth. 2006 Dec;33(4):284-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00120.x. Birth. 2006. PMID: 17150066
-
A review of fetal cardiac monitoring, with a focus on low- and middle-income countries.Physiol Meas. 2020 Dec 18;41(11):11TR01. doi: 10.1088/1361-6579/abc4c7. Physiol Meas. 2020. PMID: 33105122 Free PMC article. Review.