Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1984 Winter;17(4):477-83.
doi: 10.1901/jaba.1984.17-477.

Contingent reinforcement for carbon monoxide reduction: within-subject effects of pay amount

Clinical Trial

Contingent reinforcement for carbon monoxide reduction: within-subject effects of pay amount

M L Stitzer et al. J Appl Behav Anal. 1984 Winter.

Abstract

The relationship between reinforcer amount and daytime smoking reduction in smokers offered money for reduced afternoon breath carbon monoxide (CO) levels was examined. Twenty-three hired regular smokers with average baseline CO levels of about 30 ppm were exposed in random order to five sliding scale payment schedules that changed daily or weekly. Money was available for afternoon CO readings between 0 and 21 ppm with pay amount inversely related to the absolute CO reading obtained. Maximum pay amount for readings below 7 ppm varied among $0, $1.50, $3, $6, and $12 per day. Contingent reinforcement promoted CO and daytime cigarette reduction within individuals with the amount of behavior change related to the amount of payment available. Average CO levels decreased from 30 to 15 ppm as a function of pay amount whereas self-reported daytime cigarettes decreased from 12 to 5 per day. Average minutes of cigarette abstinence prior to the afternoon study contact increased from 62 to 319 minutes as a function of pay amount, whereas the percentage of available money earned increased from 22% to 48%. Nontargeted evening cigarette use also decreased during periods of daytime smoking reduction. The orderly effects of this contingent reinforcement intervention on daytime smoking of regular smoker volunteers suggest that this is a sensitive model for continued evaluation of factors that influence smoking reduction and cessation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Mar;12(2):253-9 - PubMed
    1. Addict Behav. 1982;7(4):403-12 - PubMed
    1. J Appl Behav Anal. 1979 Fall;12(3):407-15 - PubMed
    1. Addict Behav. 1980;5(3):265-72 - PubMed
    1. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1979 Oct;65(2):125-36 - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources