Similar articles

• Comparison of blood-brain barrier disruption by intracarotid iopamidol and methylglucamine iothalamate.

  Sage MR, Wilcox J, Evill CA, Benness GT. Sage MR, et al. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1983 Jul-Aug;4(4):893-5. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1983. PMID: 6410875 Free PMC article.
• Comparison and evaluation of osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption following intracarotid mannitol and methylglucamine iothalamate.

  Sage MR, Wilcox J, Evill CA, Benness GT. Sage MR, et al. Invest Radiol. 1982 May-Jun;17(3):276-81. Invest Radiol. 1982. PMID: 6811497
• Safety of contrast media in cerebral angiography: iopamidol vs. methylglucamine iothalamate.

  Bird CR, Drayer BP, Velaj R, Triolo PJ, Allen S, Bates M, Yeates AE, Heinz ER, Osborne DR. Bird CR, et al. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1984 Nov-Dec;5(6):801-3. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1984. PMID: 6437183 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
• Comparative neurotoxicity of angiographic contrast media.

  Velaj R, Drayer B, Albright R, Fram E. Velaj R, et al. Neurology. 1985 Sep;35(9):1290-8. doi: 10.1212/wnl.35.9.1290. Neurology. 1985. PMID: 3927186
• [Use of non-ionogenic contrast media for myelography].

  Sviridov NK, Popova ZP, Varfolomeeva VN. Sviridov NK, et al. Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko. 1984 Jul-Aug;(4):50-3. Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko. 1984. PMID: 6388202 Review. Russian. No abstract available.