Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1978 Jun;132(6):573-7.
doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1978.02120310037006.

Rubella, measles and mumps antibodies following vaccination of children. A potential rubella problem

Rubella, measles and mumps antibodies following vaccination of children. A potential rubella problem

H H Balfour Jr et al. Am J Dis Child. 1978 Jun.

Abstract

One hundred sixty-eight children immunized by one suburban Minneapolis clinic during routine pediatric visits had serum antibodies measured to determine the efficacy of rubella (HPV77 DE5 strain), measles (Edmonston B and Moraten strains), and mumps (Jeryl Lynn strain) vaccines. Serologic failure rates at the mean postvaccination times tested were as follows: rubella, 36% (4.7 years); measles, 18% (6.5 years); and mumps, 9% (4.5 years). Antibody titers shortly after vaccination were not done, so seronegative subjects may never have responded or their titers may have declined with time; our rubella data suggest the former. Children vaccinated with rubella and measles at less than 14 months of age had higher failure rates than those vaccinated at a later age. This supports postponement of rubella and measles vaccinations until at least 15 months of age. In addition to current measles reimmunization policies, consideration also should be given to reimmunizing girls who were given rubella vaccine at less than 14 months of age. Twenty-four percent (19/79) of children vaccinated with HPV77 DE5 strain rubella at 14 months or older had rubella hemagglutination-inhibiting titers less than 8. This is disturbing and, if confirmed by others, would prompt the use of a different strain of rubella vaccine for routine immunization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types