[Comparison of a 2-phase preparation (Oviol 22) with a low-dose 1-phase preparation (Ovoresta M)]
- PMID: 6570117
- DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1036524
[Comparison of a 2-phase preparation (Oviol 22) with a low-dose 1-phase preparation (Ovoresta M)]
Abstract
Oviol 22 was administered to 145, and Ovoresta M to 118 healthy female volunteers. During the first six cycles, 27 (18.6%) women discontinued the Oviol 22 intake, and 45 (38,1%) women discontinued the Ovoresta M intake. The other women were observed over 6 cycles. Together, 1,369 cycles were evaluated. Overall, the clinical results with Oviol 22 were more favourable than those with Ovoresta M. The discontinuation rate because of nausea, headache, acne and breast tenderness was lower in the group of women who received Oviol 22 than in the group of women receiving Ovoresta M. Cycle control was much better with Oviol 22 than with Ovoresta M. Following the administration of both preparations, no significant alteration in blood pressure, weight or mental status was seen. None of the patients became pregnant during the period of observation.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of two monophasic oral contraceptives: gestodene/ethinyl estradiol versus desogestrel/ethinyl estradiol.Int J Fertil. 1989 Sep;34 Suppl:31-9. Int J Fertil. 1989. PMID: 2576255 Clinical Trial.
-
Oral contraception with a triphasic combination of gestodene and ethinyl estradiol: results of a multicenter clinical study.Int J Fertil. 1987;32 Suppl:45-8. Int J Fertil. 1987. PMID: 2906346 Clinical Trial.
-
[Effect of hormonal contraceptives containing 0.05 mg ethinyl estradiol and 0.125 mg desogestrel in normophasic regimen (Oviol)].Fortschr Med. 1982 Apr 29;100(16):764-7. Fortschr Med. 1982. PMID: 6211403 Clinical Trial. German.
-
[Clinical aspects of a new, very low dose combination contraceptive].Fortschr Med. 1978 Apr 6;96(13):723-6. Fortschr Med. 1978. PMID: 631715 German.
-
[Individualization of low-dose oral contraceptives. Pharmacological principles and practical indications for oral contraceptives].Minerva Ginecol. 2007 Aug;59(4):415-25. Minerva Ginecol. 2007. PMID: 17923832 Review. Italian.
Cited by
-
Biphasic versus monophasic oral contraceptives for contraception.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;2006(3):CD002032. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002032.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006. PMID: 16855983 Free PMC article.
-
Triphasic versus monophasic oral contraceptives for contraception.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Nov 9;2011(11):CD003553. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003553.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011. PMID: 22071807 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources