The prevalence of mandibular dysfunction. Part I: Sex and age distribution of related signs and symptoms
- PMID: 6576162
- DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(83)90171-3
The prevalence of mandibular dysfunction. Part I: Sex and age distribution of related signs and symptoms
Abstract
This study concludes the following: 1. Mandibular dysfunction is extensive. 2. Age and sex differences are apparent with various signs and symptoms. 3. Women and younger patients tend to respond positively more often than men and older patients to questions relating to subjective TMJ and muscle symptoms. 4. Objective TMJ and occlusal signs show little age or sex differentiation. 5. Positive responses to questions regarding bruxism were more common in men. 6. Age and sex differences in the prevalence of mandibular dysfunction may be influenced by the method of investigation (anamnestic versus clinical examination) and by the signs and symptoms selected to be representative of this disorder. When compared with the findings of earlier investigations, the conclusions suggest that social, cultural, psychologic, sex, and age differences contribute to the responses to questions pertaining to mandibular dysfunction. However, this may not be an accurate reflection of the prevalence of mandibular dysfunction since the objective signs do not show the age and sex differences that the subjective symptoms indicate. Therefore, additional studies are needed to correlate all data to establish a more reliable profile of both signs and symptoms of mandibular dysfunction.
Similar articles
-
Prevalence of mandibular dysfunction in young adults.J Am Dent Assoc. 1979 Jan;98(1):25-34. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1979.0008. J Am Dent Assoc. 1979. PMID: 282342
-
The prevalence of mandibular dysfunction. Part II: A multiphasic dysfunction profile.J Prosthet Dent. 1983 Aug;50(2):237-44. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(83)90024-0. J Prosthet Dent. 1983. PMID: 6578332
-
Signs and symptoms of mandibular dysfunction in shortened dental arches.J Oral Rehabil. 1988 Sep;15(5):413-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1988.tb00177.x. J Oral Rehabil. 1988. PMID: 3072392 Review.
-
Subjective symptoms in temporomandibular joint osteoarthrosis.Acta Odontol Scand. 1977;35(4):207-15. doi: 10.3109/00016357709004656. Acta Odontol Scand. 1977. PMID: 268923
-
Epidemiological surveys of dysfunction of the masticatory system.Oral Sci Rev. 1976;7:54-69. Oral Sci Rev. 1976. PMID: 775371 Review.
Cited by
-
Correlation of Condylar Translation During Maximal Mouth Opening with Presence of Signs of Temporomandibular Joint Disorders in an Asymptomatic Population of 18-25 Years Age Group of Northern India.Open Dent J. 2018 Sep 28;12:770-781. doi: 10.2174/1745017901814010770. eCollection 2018. Open Dent J. 2018. PMID: 30369987 Free PMC article.
-
The relative efficacy of three cognitive-behavioral treatment approaches to temporomandibular disorders.J Behav Med. 2000 Jun;23(3):293-309. doi: 10.1023/a:1005562126071. J Behav Med. 2000. PMID: 10863679 Clinical Trial.
-
Temporomandibular disorders.J Gen Intern Med. 1994 Feb;9(2):106-12. doi: 10.1007/BF02600212. J Gen Intern Med. 1994. PMID: 8164072 Review. No abstract available.
-
Prevalence of Temporomandibular Disorder among Schoolchildren in Jordan.Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021 Mar-Apr;14(2):304-310. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1939. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021. PMID: 34413611 Free PMC article.
-
Profiling of Patients with Temporomandibular Disorders: Experience of One Tertiary Care Center.Acta Stomatol Croat. 2021 Jun;55(2):147-158. doi: 10.15644/asc55/2/4. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2021. PMID: 34248148 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources