Growth characteristics of the premaxilla and orthodontic treatment principles in bilateral cleft lip and palate
- PMID: 6580969
Growth characteristics of the premaxilla and orthodontic treatment principles in bilateral cleft lip and palate
Abstract
Sixty-three individuals with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) were studied. In 51 of these subjects no surgical set-back or early bone grafting procedures were done. In the other 12 subjects early surgical procedures to reduce the prominence of the premaxilla had been done. In the larger group the premaxilla was, on the average, protrusive until age 12, after which it gradually became more retrusive. By the end of the growth period the premaxilla was not excessively protrusive in any of these subjects. It was concluded that it is advantageous for the premaxilla in individuals with BCLP to be protrusive during most of the growth period, since the premaxilla grows forward at a slower rate than the mandible. In the 12 subjects with premaxillary surgery, midface retrusion was demonstrated at an early age. The forward growth of the premaxilla in these individuals was slower than in the BCLP without premaxillary surgery and all 12 subjects developed rather severe midface retrusion. Orthodontic treatment principles for four different stages of craniofacial and dental development have been outlined.
Similar articles
-
Long-term evaluation of bilateral cleft lip and palate patients after early secondary closure and premaxilla repositioning.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Sep;36(9):788-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2007.04.010. Epub 2007 Jul 6. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007. PMID: 17618084
-
Primary bilateral cleft lip repair with management of premaxilla without preoperative orthopedics.J Craniofac Surg. 2009 Sep;20 Suppl 2:1719-22. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181b3eec3. J Craniofac Surg. 2009. PMID: 19816338
-
Long-term effects of premaxillary setback on facial skeletal profile in complete bilateral cleft lip and palate.Cleft Palate J. 1985 Apr;22(2):97-105. Cleft Palate J. 1985. PMID: 3859392
-
Management of the premaxilla in the treatment of bilateral cleft of lip and palate: what can the literature tell us?Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Mar;20(2):207-17. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1589-y. Epub 2015 Sep 16. Clin Oral Investig. 2016. PMID: 26374747 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Orthodontic management of the cleft lip and palate patient.Clin Plast Surg. 1993 Oct;20(4):733-53. Clin Plast Surg. 1993. PMID: 8275637 Review.
Cited by
-
Pre-maxillary complex morphology in bilateral cleft and hypothesis on laterality of deviated pre-maxilla.Indian J Plast Surg. 2016 Sep-Dec;49(3):336-339. doi: 10.4103/0970-0358.197247. Indian J Plast Surg. 2016. PMID: 28216813 Free PMC article.
-
Preoperative Correction Using Barbed Sutures as an Alternative to Lip Adhesion for Complete Bilateral Cleft Lip With Prominent Protrusion of the Premaxilla: A Case Report.Clin Case Rep. 2025 Jul 29;13(8):e70694. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.70694. eCollection 2025 Aug. Clin Case Rep. 2025. PMID: 40741112 Free PMC article.
-
Displacements prediction from 3D finite element model of maxillary protraction with and without rapid maxillary expansion in a patient with unilateral cleft palate and alveolus.Biomed Eng Online. 2015 Aug 19;14:80. doi: 10.1186/s12938-015-0074-9. Biomed Eng Online. 2015. PMID: 26285822 Free PMC article.
-
Facial profile esthetics in operated children with bilateral cleft lip and palate.Dental Press J Orthod. 2017 Jul-Aug;22(4):41-46. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.22.4.041-046.oar. Dental Press J Orthod. 2017. PMID: 28902248 Free PMC article.
-
Protocols for Late Maxillary Protraction in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients at Childrens Hospital Los Angeles.Semin Orthod. 2011 Jun 1;17(2):138-148. doi: 10.1053/j.sodo.2011.01.001. Semin Orthod. 2011. PMID: 21765629 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical