Oral contraceptive use and fibrocystic breast disease of different histologic classifications
- PMID: 6582316
Oral contraceptive use and fibrocystic breast disease of different histologic classifications
Abstract
The relationship between oral contraceptive (OC) use and occurrence of fibrocystic breast disease (FBD) of different histologic classifications was evaluated with data from a cohort study. Biopsy specimens from 232 women with FBD were classified into different atypia categories. In 96 matched pairs of OC users and nonusers, atypia scores were lower in users than in nonusers. Women without breast diseases (500 OC users and 500 nonusers) were sampled from the original cohort to form a two-stage "anamorphic" study with the 232 cases of FBD. The previously shown inverse association between OC use and FBD occurrence was present and increased with increased length of OC use. However, the "protective effect" of OC use did not vary for different histologic classifications of FBD. The findings from both paired and anamorphic analyses of the data are not consistent with the hypothesis that the use of OC is associated with decreased frequency only of FBD with minimal epithelial atypia.
Similar articles
-
Oral contraceptive use and fibrocystic breast disease with special reference to its histopathology.J Natl Cancer Inst. 1983 Jul;71(1):5-9. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1983. PMID: 6575209
-
Fibrocystic breast disease in oral-contraceptive users. A histopathological evaluation of epithelial atypia.N Engl J Med. 1978 Aug 24;299(8):381-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197808242990803. N Engl J Med. 1978. PMID: 566853
-
[Contraception without risk of breast disease: epidemiologic and physiopathologic arguments].NPN Med. 1985 Apr 2;5(88):471-6. NPN Med. 1985. PMID: 12315304 French.
-
Risks of oral contraceptive use in women over 35.J Reprod Med. 1993 Dec;38(12 Suppl):1030-5. J Reprod Med. 1993. PMID: 8120860 Review.
-
Nonassociation of caffeine and fibrocystic breast disease.Arch Intern Med. 1986 Sep;146(9):1773-5. Arch Intern Med. 1986. PMID: 3530165 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluating Public Health Interventions: 3. The Two-Stage Design for Confounding Bias Reduction-Having Your Cake and Eating It Two.Am J Public Health. 2016 Jul;106(7):1223-6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303250. Am J Public Health. 2016. PMID: 27285260 Free PMC article.