Osseous adaptation to continuous loading of rigid endosseous implants
- PMID: 6589962
- DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(84)90301-4
Osseous adaptation to continuous loading of rigid endosseous implants
Abstract
Titanium implants, with an acid-etched surface, were screwed into holes 3 mm in diameter, about 1 cm apart, carefully prepared with an internally irrigated, surgical bur in the femurs of 3- to 6-month-old rabbits. During the first 3 days after surgery, fluorescent bone labels revealed extensive bone formation, particularly at the endosteal margin of the surgical defect, indicating preservation of a high degree of osteogenic capacity. A lattice of coarse, woven bone began encapsulating the implant within 3 days. By the end of 6 weeks, mature, lamellar bone filled voids at or near the implant surface and a rigid bone/implant interface was routinely achieved. Nonspecific, subperiosteal bony hypertrophy was noted within 6 weeks after implants were placed in young, growing animals (3 months old), but not in adults (6 months old). After 6 to 12 weeks of healing, a 100-gm load was applied for 4 to 8 weeks by stretching a stainless steel spring between the implants. All but one of twenty loaded implants remained rigid. Immediate loading of four pairs of implants resulted in spontaneous spiral-type ("torsional") fractures of the femur within 1 week. These results indicate that (1) relatively simple and inexpensive titanium implants develop a rigid osseous interface, (2) 6 weeks is an adequate healing period, prior to loading, to attain rigid stability and avoid spontaneous fracture, (3) continuously loaded implants remain stable within the bone, (4) bone formation is observed on periosteal surfaces subjected to concave flexure (compression), (5) cancellous-type bone orients perpendicularly between loaded implants, apparently corresponding to lines of stress, (6) new secondary osteons are propagated at or near the surface of loaded implants, (7) the remodeling (turnover) cycle for rabbit compact bone is about 6 weeks, and (8) endosseous implants have potential as a source of firm osseous anchorage for orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics.
Similar articles
-
The use of small titanium screws for orthodontic anchorage.J Dent Res. 2003 May;82(5):377-81. doi: 10.1177/154405910308200510. J Dent Res. 2003. PMID: 12709505
-
Rigid endosseous implants for orthodontic and orthopedic anchorage.Angle Orthod. 1989 Winter;59(4):247-56. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1989)059<0247:REIFOA>2.0.CO;2. Angle Orthod. 1989. PMID: 2688486
-
Early cortical bone healing around loaded titanium implants: a histological study in the rabbit.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Feb;20(2):126-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01623.x. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009. PMID: 19191791
-
Peri-implant osteogenesis in health and osteoporosis.Micron. 2005;36(7-8):630-44. doi: 10.1016/j.micron.2005.07.008. Epub 2005 Sep 6. Micron. 2005. PMID: 16182543 Review.
-
Bone tissue interface.J Dent Educ. 1988 Dec;52(12):804-9. J Dent Educ. 1988. PMID: 3057027 Review.
Cited by
-
Effects of immediate and delayed loading protocols on marginal bone loss around implants in unsplinted mandibular implant-retained overdentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Oral Health. 2021 Mar 17;21(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01486-3. BMC Oral Health. 2021. PMID: 33731092 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of surface anodization on stability of orthodontic microimplant.Korean J Orthod. 2012 Feb;42(1):4-10. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2012.42.1.4. Epub 2012 Feb 27. Korean J Orthod. 2012. PMID: 23112925 Free PMC article.
-
Changes in the fractal dimension of peri-implant trabecular bone after loading: a retrospective study.J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2013 Oct;43(5):209-14. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2013.43.5.209. Epub 2013 Oct 29. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2013. PMID: 24236242 Free PMC article.
-
[Endosseous titanium implants as orthodontic anchoring elements. Experimental studies and clinical application].Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1994 Oct;55(5):236-50. doi: 10.1007/BF02173755. Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1994. PMID: 7995605 German.
-
Osseointegration of standard and mini dental implants: a histomorphometric comparison.Int J Implant Dent. 2017 Dec;3(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s40729-017-0079-1. Epub 2017 May 1. Int J Implant Dent. 2017. PMID: 28462508 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources
Medical