Importance of complete revascularization in performance of the coronary bypass operation

Abstract

Cardiac Data Bank records of 1,238 patients with triple-vessel disease (greater than or equal to 50% diameter reduction) who had undergone coronary bypass surgery were reviewed and divided into 2 groups depending on whether complete (n = 773) or incomplete (n = 465) revascularization had been accomplished. Patients with complete revascularization had a higher incidence of a normal preoperative electrocardiogram than did patients with incomplete revascularization (23 versus 14%, respectively, p less than 0.0001). The ejection fraction for both completely and incompletely revascularized patients was good (m = 0.60 and 0.57, respectively). The mean number of grafts per patient for the 2 groups was 3.8 and 2.6 (p less than 0.0001). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups with regard to postoperative inotropic requirements (8 and 7%), ventricular arrhythmias (1.8 and less than 1%), necessity for intraaortic balloon pumping (1.6 and 1.5%, hospital mortality (1.2 and 2.8%), or myocardial infarction (4.3 and 4.8%). Survival at 5 years was significantly greater (p less than 0.001) in patients with complete (88.5%) than in those with incomplete revascularization (83.5%). Reemployment occurred more often in patients with complete (52%) than in those with incomplete revascularization (40%) (p less than 0.001), and more patients were free of angina after complete (70%) than after incomplete revascularization (58%) (p less than 0.0005). Long-term survival appeared to be mediated primarily through improved revascularization rather than through differences in left ventricular function.