Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1983 Sep;65(5):326-8.

Abdominal drainage following cholecystectomy: high, low, or no suction?

Clinical Trial

Abdominal drainage following cholecystectomy: high, low, or no suction?

T T McCormack et al. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1983 Sep.

Abstract

A prospective trial to assess the effect of suction in an abdominal drain following cholecystectomy was carried out. Three types of closed drainage system were compared: a simple tube drain, a low negative pressure drain, and a high negative pressure drain: 120 consecutive patients undergoing cholecystectomy were randomly allocated to one of the three drainage groups. There was no significant difference in postoperative pyrexia, wound infection, chest infection, or hospital stay. This study failed to demonstrate any clinically useful difference between high negative pressure, low negative pressure, and static drainage system were compared: a simple tube drain, a low negative used, suction is not necessary and a simple tube drain (greater than 6 mm internal diameter) is the most effective form of drainage.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Arch Surg. 1973 Aug;107(2):206-10 - PubMed
    1. Acta Chir Scand Suppl. 1977;475:1-23 - PubMed
    1. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1981 Apr;152(4):517-27 - PubMed
    1. Am J Surg. 1975 Jul;130(1):29-32 - PubMed
    1. Am J Surg. 1981 Feb;141(2):289-94 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources