The selective nature of metastasis
- PMID: 6616441
- DOI: 10.1007/BF00046904
The selective nature of metastasis
Abstract
The issue of whether metastases result from the random survival of cells released from a primary tumor or from the selective growth of specialized tumor subpopulations endowed with metastatic properties is important to our understanding of the metastatic process and to the development of therapeutic modalities against metastatic disease. We have found that the tumor cells populating spontaneous metastases are more metastatic than the cells populating the parent neoplasm, clearly indicating that metastasis is selective and not random. The selective nature of metastasis is a consistent observation, however, only when tumor cells are obtained from spontaneous metastases from mice bearing heterogenous, poorly metastatic tumors. Tumor cells from spontaneous metastases from mice bearing tumors that have been selected for metastatic potential or that are homogeneous (cloned) do not differ significantly in metastatic potential from tumor cells populating the parent tumor. Thus, under some conditions the process of metastasis can appear random. Although tumor cells from different individual metastases may be homogeneous with regard to a metastatic phenotype, they may be heterogeneous with regard to their sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents. Thus, although metastasis selects for metastatic variants, resulting in the population of metastatic foci with tumor cells endowed with metastatic properties, it does not appear to select for phenotypes irrelevant to the process of metastasis such as sensitivity to therapeutic agents.
Similar articles
-
Enhanced metastatic potential of tumor cells harvested from spontaneous metastases of heterogeneous murine tumors.J Natl Cancer Inst. 1982 Oct;69(4):975-80. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1982. PMID: 6750200
-
Metastatic potential of metastases, tumor cell heterogeneity, and therapeutic implications.Recent Results Cancer Res. 1982;80:1-8. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-81685-7_1. Recent Results Cancer Res. 1982. PMID: 7058275
-
Experimental systems for analysis of the malignant phenotype.Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1982;1(2):141-99. doi: 10.1007/BF00048224. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1982. PMID: 6764376 Review.
-
Biological diversity in metastatic neoplasms: origins and implications.Science. 1982 Sep 10;217(4564):998-1003. doi: 10.1126/science.7112116. Science. 1982. PMID: 7112116
-
The Ernst W. Bertner Memorial Award lecture: the evolution of biological heterogeneity in metastatic neoplasms.Symp Fundam Cancer Res. 1983;36:5-26. Symp Fundam Cancer Res. 1983. PMID: 6382521 Review.
Cited by
-
Organ specificity of tumor metastasis: role of preferential adhesion, invasion and growth of malignant cells at specific secondary sites.Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1988 Jun;7(2):143-88. doi: 10.1007/BF00046483. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1988. PMID: 3293836 Review.
-
Influence of tumor transplantation methods on tumor growth rate and metastatic potential of solitary tumors derived from metastases.Clin Exp Metastasis. 1990 Jul-Aug;8(4):381-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01810682. Clin Exp Metastasis. 1990. PMID: 2350921
-
Quantitative genetic analysis of tumor progression.Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1985;4(2):173-92. doi: 10.1007/BF00050694. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1985. PMID: 3893685 Review.
-
Comments on 'In vivo selection of human renal carcinoma cells with high metastatic potenital in nude mice'.Clin Exp Metastasis. 1990 Jan-Feb;8(1):103-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00155596. Clin Exp Metastasis. 1990. PMID: 2293910 No abstract available.
-
N-linked oligosaccharides and metastatic propensity in in vivo selected mouse mammary adenocarcinoma cells.Clin Exp Metastasis. 1999 Jul;17(5):437-44. doi: 10.1023/a:1006629119030. Clin Exp Metastasis. 1999. PMID: 10651311