Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1983 Jul;398(2):96-102.
doi: 10.1007/BF00581055.

Effect of amiloride on electrolyte transport parameters of the main duct of the rabbit mandibular salivary gland

Effect of amiloride on electrolyte transport parameters of the main duct of the rabbit mandibular salivary gland

J Bijman et al. Pflugers Arch. 1983 Jul.

Abstract

We have studied the response of the rabbit mandibular main duct perfused in vitro to luminally administered amiloride. The half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (KI) when the duct was bathed in Cl solutions were: for net Na+ transport, 3 X 10(-6) mol l-1; for transepithelial potential difference, 6 X 10(-6) mol l-1; and for transepithelial conductance, 3 X 10(-7) mol l-1. Substitution of the impermeant SO2-(4) anion for Cl- changed the KI for conductance to 3 X 10(-6) mol l-1. Within Cl- -containing media, the time course of the amiloride effect on potential difference showed an early rapid fall of 10 mV with a half-time 2 s, followed by a slower depolarization of 9 mV, and the conductance change followed the slower component of the potential change. In SO2-(4)-containing media, the potential difference and conductance changes followed time courses similar to one another. Finally, experiments on the effect of serosal applications of ouabain revealed that, although, in general, ouabain reduced resistance, it caused an increase in resistance in those ducts where the initial resistance was low. We conclude that: i) luminal Na+ transport occurs via amiloride-sensitive, conductive Na+ channels; ii) the Cl- conductance is the major determinant of transepithelial conductance; iii) the first phase of the potential response is due to blocking of the Na+ conductive channels, whilst the slow phase reflects secondary inhibition of an electrogenic Na+ pump; and iv) duct resistance changes are secondary to alterations in intracellular Cl- concentration.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Nature. 1977 Aug 18;268(5621):657-8 - PubMed
    1. J Biol Chem. 1982 Aug 25;257(16):9394-400 - PubMed
    1. Am J Physiol. 1980 Apr;238(4):F261-8 - PubMed
    1. J Membr Biol. 1977 Apr 7;32(1-2):115-32 - PubMed
    1. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1977 May;24(3):291-3 - PubMed

Publication types