A femoral head prosthesis with a built-in joint. A radiological study of the movements of the two components
- PMID: 6643555
- DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.65B5.6643555
A femoral head prosthesis with a built-in joint. A radiological study of the movements of the two components
Abstract
Twenty patients each with a fractured femoral neck had a prosthesis with a built-in ball-and-socket joint inserted. Movements at the built-in joint were compared with total hip movement immediately after operation, one month later and three months later. It was found that the built-in joint soon lost mobility and at three months was almost completely stiff. Consequently such joints cannot be expected to prevent the acetabular erosion which is liable to follow femoral head replacement for fracture.
Similar articles
-
[Comparative study on association between femoral head size and linear wear rate of highly cross-linked polyethylene liner].Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Nov;28(11):1333-7. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014. PMID: 25639045 Chinese.
-
The movements of the components of the Hastings bipolar prosthesis. A radiographic study in 65 patients.J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1989 Mar;71(2):186-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.71B2.2925732. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1989. PMID: 2925732
-
[Application of Tri-Lock bone preservation stem in acetabular protrusion combined with shorten defect of femoral head and neck].Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2018 Feb 25;31(2):129-134. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2018.02.007. Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2018. PMID: 29536682 Chinese.
-
Femoral offset: anatomical concept, definition, assessment, implications for preoperative templating and hip arthroplasty.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009 May;95(3):210-9. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2009.03.010. Epub 2009 May 6. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009. PMID: 19423418 Review.
-
[Ball and socket endoprosthesis of the hip joint--resurfacing surgery as a hip joint saving procedure].Orthopade. 1979 May;8(3):276-95. Orthopade. 1979. PMID: 15655947 Review. German. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Unipolar versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.J Orthop Surg Res. 2015 Jan 24;10:8. doi: 10.1186/s13018-015-0165-0. J Orthop Surg Res. 2015. PMID: 25616914 Free PMC article.
-
Unipolar hemiarthroplasty versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty in patients with displaced femoral neck fractures: a four-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial.Int Orthop. 2013 Dec;37(12):2457-64. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2117-9. Int Orthop. 2013. PMID: 24122045 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Ipsilateral Fracture Shaft Femur with Neglected Dislocation of Prosthesis: A Case Report.J Orthop Case Rep. 2013 Oct-Dec;3(4):26-30. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2250-0685.127. J Orthop Case Rep. 2013. PMID: 27298927 Free PMC article.
-
Bipolar or unipolar hemiarthroplasty after femoral neck fracture in the geriatric population.Balkan Med J. 2013 Dec;30(4):400-5. doi: 10.5152/balkanmedj.2013.8571. Epub 2013 Dec 1. Balkan Med J. 2013. PMID: 25207148 Free PMC article.
-
Risk of Aseptic Revision and Periprosthetic Fracture Following Bipolar Versus Unipolar Hemiarthroplasty.JB JS Open Access. 2023 Jun 20;8(2):e23.00009. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00009. eCollection 2023 Apr-Jun. JB JS Open Access. 2023. PMID: 37351088 Free PMC article.