Portsmouth operative delivery trial: a comparison vacuum extraction and forceps delivery

Abstract

A total of 304 women, for whom operative delivery was considered necessary in the second stage of labour, were randomly assigned to delivery by vacuum extraction or forceps. Of those allocated to forceps a higher proportion of babies were actually delivered with the allocated instrument; however, the caesarean section rate was also higher in this group. Maternal trauma, use of analgesia and blood loss at delivery were significantly less in the group allocated to vacuum extraction. Vacuum extraction did, however, appear to predispose to an increase in mild neonatal jaundice. More serious neonatal morbidity was rare in both groups and the trial was of insufficient size to rule out a clinically important differential effect of the two instruments on these measures of outcome. Another trial is now needed to address this still open question more rigorously.