Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1983;51(3):409-17.
doi: 10.1007/BF00429077.

Load optimization for the Wingate Anaerobic Test

Comparative Study

Load optimization for the Wingate Anaerobic Test

R Dotan et al. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1983.

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to define the optimal loads (OL) for eliciting maximal power-outputs (PO) in the leg and arm modes of the 30s Wingate Anaerobic Test (WAnT). Eighteen female and seventeen male physical education students, respectively 20.6 +/- 1.6 and 24.1 +/- 2.5 years old, volunteered to participate. In each of the total five sessions, the test was administered twice on a convertible, mechanically braked cycle-ergometer, once for the legs and once for the arms. The five randomized, evenly-spaced resistance loads ranged from 2.43 to 5.39 Joule per pedal revolution per kg body weight (B. W.) for the legs, and from 1.96 to 3.92 for the arms. The measured variables were mean (MP x kg-1) and peak PO as well as absolute and relative measures of fatigue. A parabola-fitting technique was employed to define the optimal loads from the MP x kg-1 data. The resulting OL were 5.04 and 5.13 Joule x Rev-1 x kg B.W.-1 in the leg and 2.82 and 3.52 in the arm tests for the women and men, respectively. OL were shown to depend on PO magnitude. However, within a two-load span (0.98 Joule x Rev-1 x kg B.W.-1) about the OL, MP x kg-1 did not vary by more than 1.4% in the leg and 2.2% in the arm tests. It is suggested that although the WAnT is rather insensitive to moderate variation in load assignment, improved results could be obtained by using the stated OL as guidelines that may be modified according to individual body build, composition, and, particularly, anaerobic fitness level.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Med Sci Sports. 1979 Fall;11(3):278-83 - PubMed
    1. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1964;16:646-54 - PubMed
    1. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1981 Jun;6(2):53-6 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1977 Dec 22;37(4):297-304 - PubMed
    1. Ergonomics. 1977 Sep;20(5):491-8 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources