Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1984 Jan 1;53(1):234-7.
doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(84)90718-5.

Determination of cardiac output by transcutaneous continuous-wave ultrasonic Doppler computer

Determination of cardiac output by transcutaneous continuous-wave ultrasonic Doppler computer

P A Chandraratna et al. Am J Cardiol. .

Abstract

To evaluate the accuracy of a new, portable, continuous-wave Doppler computer (Ultracom) in measuring cardiac output (CO), simultaneous thermodilution CO and Doppler CO were measured in triplicate in 39 selected patients. Technically adequate Doppler CO studies were obtained in 36 patients. Aortic root diameter was measured by echocardiography and the cross-sectional area was calculated. A continuous-wave Doppler transducer was placed in the suprasternal notch, directed toward the ascending aorta and angled until the maximal velocity signal was achieved. The systolic velocity integral was computed using fast Fourier transform technique. The Doppler CO was computed from the equation: CO = aortic cross-sectional area X systolic velocity integral X heart rate. Interobserver and intraobserver variability studies were also performed. CO measured by thermodilution ranged from 1.86 to 10.1 liters/min (mean 5.26 +/- 1.91 [+/- standard deviation]) and CO by the Doppler method ranged from 1.63 to 10.9 liters/min (mean 5.32 +/- 1.83). The correlation coefficient was 0.97 (p less than 0.001) and standard error of the estimate was 0.42. The regression equation showed that Doppler CO = 0.408 + 0.93 X thermodilution CO. The correlation in 29 volunteers for interobserver variability was 0.98 (p less than 0.001) and in 18 volunteers for intraobserver variability was 0.97 (p less than 0.001). Thus, CO can be determined accurately in many patients using this Doppler technique by trained and experienced persons; intra- and interobserver variability is small.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources