Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1984 Jan;17(1):9-14.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1984.tb04991.x.

Do saliva concentrations predict plasma unbound theophylline concentrations? A problem re-examined

Do saliva concentrations predict plasma unbound theophylline concentrations? A problem re-examined

C Knott et al. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1984 Jan.

Abstract

On the assumption that plasma unbound drug concentrations are therapeutically active, the value of saliva concentrations in predicting plasma unbound theophylline concentrations was investigated in 25 ambulatory adults (aged 27 to 84 years) receiving theophylline (225-1350 mg aminophylline daily) for asthma or chronic bronchitis. Plasma samples from all patients were ultrafiltered, and the plasma unbound theophylline (F) concentrations were compared with the corresponding total plasma (P), citric acid stimulated saliva (S) and non-stimulated saliva (Ns) theophylline concentrations. Plasma unbound theophylline concentrations correlated significantly with P (r = 0.97) and S (r = 0.973), but less well with Ns (r = 0.883), emphasising the benefit of saliva stimulation. The ability of S to predict F theophylline concentrations was assessed using the mean ratio of 0.7297. In 92% of the patients, predicted F concentrations were within +/- 1 microgram/ml of the measured concentrations. Similarly, using the mean F/P ratio of 0.418, predicted P were within +/- 1 microgram/ml of obtained P in 84% patients, and using the mean S/P ratio of 0.568, predicted P were within +/- 1 microgram/ml of obtained P in 81%. An accuracy of +/- 1 microgram/ml in estimating F from S concentrations would be sufficient to indicate appropriate dose adjustments, and we therefore advocate the use of stimulated saliva samples for routine monitoring of theophylline therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Postgrad Med J. 1980 Feb;56(652):85-7 - PubMed
    1. J Pediatr. 1980 Nov;97(5):825-8 - PubMed
    1. Am J Dis Child. 1981 Feb;135(2):137-9 - PubMed
    1. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1981 Feb;11(2):203-8 - PubMed
    1. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1981 Mar;11(3):269-73 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources