Bileaflet, tilting disc and porcine aortic valve substitutes: in vivo hydrodynamic characteristics
- PMID: 6693620
- DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(84)80015-7
Bileaflet, tilting disc and porcine aortic valve substitutes: in vivo hydrodynamic characteristics
Abstract
The St. Jude valve is a new bileaflet disc cardiac valve prosthesis designed to avoid some of the hemodynamic drawbacks of other prostheses. The in vivo flow characteristics of the St. Jude aortic valve (42 patients) were studied and compared with those of three other commonly used aortic prostheses. Björk-Shiley (12 patients), Hancock (27 patients) and Carpentier-Edwards (15 patients). The studies, performed 24 to 48 hours after surgery, included measurements at rest and during augmentation of valve flow by infusion of isoproterenol. The mean performance index for valves of all sizes is higher for the St. Jude than for either porcine valve, both at rest and during isoproterenol infusion (p less than 0.05). Utilizing data both at rest and with isoproterenol, the relation of valve flow and mean systolic gradient for each size of St. Jude valve (19 to 25 mm) indicates the occurrence of small increases in gradient (5.3 to 8.2 mm Hg) as valve flow increases, ranging from 161 to 436 ml/systolic X min. A direct comparison of valve flow and gradient data for all size 25 and 23 mm prostheses at rest indicates a tendency for a lower mean systolic gradient in both mechanical valves than in either porcine valve (p = 0.07). With isoproterenol augmentation of valve flow in 25 mm valves, the gradient is less (p less than 0.05), and the effective orifice area and performance index are larger (p less than 0.05) for the St. Jude than for either porcine valve.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Similar articles
-
Bileaflet, tilting disc and porcine aortic valve substitutes: in vitro hydrodynamic characteristics.J Am Coll Cardiol. 1984 Feb;3(2 Pt 1):313-20. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(84)80014-5. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1984. PMID: 6693619
-
[Doppler echocardiography in assessing mechanical and biological heart valve prostheses].G Ital Cardiol. 1988 Feb;18(2):121-34. G Ital Cardiol. 1988. PMID: 3410201 Italian.
-
Effect of prosthetic aortic valve design on the Doppler-catheter gradient correlation: an in vitro study of normal St. Jude, Medtronic-Hall, Starr-Edwards and Hancock valves.J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992 Feb;19(2):324-32. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(92)90486-7. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992. PMID: 1531058
-
Rest and exercise hemodynamics following aortic valve replacement. A comparison between 19 and 21 mm Ionescu-Shiley pericardial and Carpentier-Edwards porcine valves.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1985 Nov;90(5):750-5. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1985. PMID: 4058047
-
Porcine valves: Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards aortic prostheses.Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996 Jul;8(3):259-68. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996. PMID: 8843517 Review.
Cited by
-
Anticoagulant independent mechanical heart valves: viable now or still a distant holy grail.Ann Transl Med. 2016 Dec;4(24):525. doi: 10.21037/atm.2016.12.58. Ann Transl Med. 2016. PMID: 28149886 Free PMC article.
-
Numerical and in-vitro experimental assessment of the performance of a novel designed expanded-polytetrafluoroethylene stentless bi-leaflet valve for aortic valve replacement.PLoS One. 2019 Jan 30;14(1):e0210780. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210780. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 30699210 Free PMC article.
-
[Mechanical versus biological heart valves].Z Kardiol. 2001 Dec;90(Suppl 6):39-47. doi: 10.1007/s003920170007. Z Kardiol. 2001. PMID: 24445787 German.
-
Experimental analysis of fluid mechanical energy losses in aortic valve stenosis: importance of pressure recovery.Ann Biomed Eng. 1996 Nov-Dec;24(6):685-94. doi: 10.1007/BF02684181. Ann Biomed Eng. 1996. PMID: 8923988
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources