Pimozide and amphetamine have opposing effects on the reward summation function
- PMID: 6695003
- DOI: 10.1016/0091-3057(84)90104-7
Pimozide and amphetamine have opposing effects on the reward summation function
Abstract
The reward summation function is the plot of self-stimulation performance as a function of the number of pulses in a train of fixed duration. It has previously been shown that drugs that impair performance compress this curve but do not shift it laterally; whereas when the reinforcing efficacy is reduced by reducing current intensity, the curve shifts laterally. The amount of the shift is a measure of the magnitude of a drug's effect upon reinforcing efficacy. We report here that pimozide shifts the curve to the right in a dose-dependent manner, indicating an impairment of reinforcing efficacy, while amphetamine shifts it to the left, indicating an enhancement of reinforcing efficacy. When the two drugs are given together their effects on the reward summation function cancel out. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that pimozide and amphetamine exert their effects on reinforcing efficacy via one and the same set of dopaminergic synapses.
Similar articles
-
Nicotine and brain-stimulation reward: interactions with morphine, amphetamine and pimozide.Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1993 Oct;46(2):453-7. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(93)90378-7. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1993. PMID: 8265701
-
Reward summation and the effects of pimozide, clonidine, and amphetamine on fixed-interval responding for brain stimulation.Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1992 Aug;42(4):563-77. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(92)90001-v. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1992. PMID: 1513839
-
The effects of pimozide on the reinforcing efficacy of central grey stimulation in the rat.Behav Brain Res. 1986 Aug;21(2):95-100. doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(86)90087-2. Behav Brain Res. 1986. PMID: 3755951
-
Neural mechanisms of the reinforcing action of cocaine.NIDA Res Monogr. 1984;50:15-33. NIDA Res Monogr. 1984. PMID: 6440023 Review.
-
Social Modification of Amphetamine Reward.Int Rev Neurobiol. 2018;140:109-129. doi: 10.1016/bs.irn.2018.07.023. Epub 2018 Aug 17. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2018. PMID: 30193702 Review.
Cited by
-
The time course of neuroleptic therapy for psychosis: role of learning processes and implications for concepts of psychotic illness.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1987;92(4):405-15. doi: 10.1007/BF00176470. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1987. PMID: 2888150 Review.
-
Brain stimulation and morphine reward deficits in dopamine D2 receptor-deficient mice.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2005 Oct;182(1):33-44. doi: 10.1007/s00213-005-0051-2. Epub 2005 Sep 29. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2005. PMID: 16136297
-
Phencyclidine-induced potentiation of brain stimulation reward: acute effects are not altered by repeated administration.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1993;111(4):402-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02253528. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1993. PMID: 7870980
-
Forebrain substrates of reward and motivation.J Comp Neurol. 2005 Dec 5;493(1):115-21. doi: 10.1002/cne.20689. J Comp Neurol. 2005. PMID: 16254990 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Functional implications of glutamatergic projections to the ventral tegmental area.Rev Neurosci. 2008;19(4-5):227-44. doi: 10.1515/revneuro.2008.19.4-5.227. Rev Neurosci. 2008. PMID: 19145985 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources