Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1984 Mar;70(2):511-23.
doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0700511.

Observations on the response of human spermatozoa to gravity, boundaries and fluid shear

Observations on the response of human spermatozoa to gravity, boundaries and fluid shear

H Winet et al. J Reprod Fertil. 1984 Mar.

Abstract

Human sperm motility response to three mechanical stimuli, gravity, fluid flow shear and rigid boundaries, was measured in a tube of 310 X 400 microns calibre. Data were gathered by cine recordings at various focussing levels d across the tube and analysed with a computerized image analysis system. The most influential stimulus was the tube wall near (more than 'at') which the swimmers tended to accumulate, leaving the fluid beyond 100 microns from the wall (d = 100) vacant of motile spermatozoa. The boundary effect was evident as soon as the spermatozoa could be viewed after loading, and accumulation, measured as frequency, as a function of d did not change with time t. This response was not significantly altered by the addition of laminar flow with a centre line velocity of about 400 microns/sec. In flow shear, spermatozoa aligned positively (in the flow direction) at the wall but negatively by about 30 microns from the wall where the velocity gradient (= shear rate) was about 3.5 sec-1. The response to gravity was relatively weak with 11 spermatozoa positive (swimming downwards) for each 9 negative. Neither the boundary effect nor the 'rheotaxic' effect were influenced by gravity as there was no statistical difference in orientation or distribution patterns between vertically and horizontally flowing suspensions. It is suggested that the boundary effect cannot be ignored in in-vitro manipulations, particularly when spermatozoa are observed or extracted. Its importance in vivo lies in the degree to which the tubes transporting motile spermatozoa seem to have mechanisms for reversing the wall accumulation tendency.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources