Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1984 Mar 1;53(6):833-7.
doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(84)90414-4.

The femoral venous approach to endomyocardial biopsy: comparison with internal jugular and transarterial approaches

Comparative Study

The femoral venous approach to endomyocardial biopsy: comparison with internal jugular and transarterial approaches

J L Anderson et al. Am J Cardiol. .

Abstract

Endomyocardial biopsy is often used in the clinical evaluation of cardiac disease. Among 134 consecutive procedures (280 myocardial samples), 3 approaches were compared: right internal jugular (n = 69), femoral arterial (n = 30) and femoral venous (n = 35). The femoral venous approach is a new method with which a preformed guiding sheath is used to allow sampling of the apical right ventricular portion of the ventricular septum. Vascular access and myocardial sampling were successful in all femoral venous and left ventricular (LV) procedures; however, the internal jugular vein could not be located to allow biopsy in 12% of neck approaches (p less than 0.025). One case of pneumothorax occurred after an internal jugular approach. Chest pain occurred after 10% (3 patients) of the LV, 4% (3 patients) of internal jugular and 3% (1 patient) of femoral venous procedures. Hypotension associated with biopsy was noted after 3 internal jugular and 2 LV procedures. Pericardial effusion was observed in 3 patients after an LV procedure (p less than 0.01). In 1 of these patients tamponade developed. The femoral venous approach had the highest overall efficiency (successful biopsy, lack of adverse events, p less than 0.05). This approach may become the procedure of choice for routine endomyocardial biopsy because it allows reliable vascular access and myocardial sampling with a low incidence of adverse reactions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources