Relative detectability of intracranial calcifications on computed tomography and skull radiography

Abstract

Phantom studies comparing skull radiography and cranial computed tomography (CT) show that CT is 5 to 15 times more sensitive than skull radiography in the detection of intracranial calcifications. The difference in detectability varies with object size. The relative sensitivity of CT increases with increased object size within the constraints of the section thickness. The relationship of these findings to the detectability of pineal and choroid calcifications is discussed.