The Karnofsky Performance Status Scale. An examination of its reliability and validity in a research setting
- PMID: 6704925
- DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19840501)53:9<2002::aid-cncr2820530933>3.0.co;2-w
The Karnofsky Performance Status Scale. An examination of its reliability and validity in a research setting
Abstract
The Karnofsky Performance Status Scale (KPS) is widely used to quantify the functional status of cancer patients. However, limited data exist documenting its reliability and validity. The KPS is used in the National Hospice Study (NHS) as both a study eligibility criterion and an outcome measure. As part of intensive training, interviewers were instructed in and tested on guidelines for determining the KPS levels of patients. After 4 months of field experience, interviewers were again tested based on narrative patient descriptions. The interrator reliability of 47 NHS interviewers was found to be 0.97. The construct validity of the KPS was analyzed, and the KPS was found to be strongly related (P less than 0.001) to two other independent measures of patient functioning. Finally, the relationship of the KPS to longevity (r = 0.30) in a population of terminal cancer patients documents its predictive validity. These findings suggest the utility of the KPS as a valuable research tool when employed by trained observers.
Similar articles
-
Karnofsky performance status revisited: reliability, validity, and guidelines.J Clin Oncol. 1984 Mar;2(3):187-93. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1984.2.3.187. J Clin Oncol. 1984. PMID: 6699671
-
Karnofsky Performance Scale validity and reliability of Turkish palliative cancer patients.Turk J Med Sci. 2019 Jun 18;49(3):894-898. doi: 10.3906/sag-1810-44. Turk J Med Sci. 2019. PMID: 31192546 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of patients with advanced cancer using the Karnofsky performance status.Cancer. 1980 Apr 15;45(8):2220-4. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19800415)45:8<2220::aid-cncr2820450835>3.0.co;2-q. Cancer. 1980. PMID: 7370963
-
Inter-rater reliability in performance status assessment among healthcare professionals: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Support Care Cancer. 2020 May;28(5):2071-2078. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05261-7. Epub 2020 Jan 3. Support Care Cancer. 2020. PMID: 31900613
-
Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) or Physical Performance Test (PPT)? That is the question.Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2011 Feb;77(2):142-7. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2010.01.015. Epub 2010 Feb 24. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2011. PMID: 20185330 Review.
Cited by
-
Risser patient satisfaction scale: a validation study in Greek cancer patients.BMC Nurs. 2012 Nov 29;11:27. doi: 10.1186/1472-6955-11-27. BMC Nurs. 2012. PMID: 23190625 Free PMC article.
-
Systemic Inflammatory Response and Elevated Tumour Markers Predict Worse Survival in Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.PLoS One. 2016 Sep 15;11(9):e0163064. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163064. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27632196 Free PMC article.
-
Sustainability of outcomes after a randomized crossover trial of resistance exercise for shoulder dysfunction in survivors of head and neck cancer.Physiother Can. 2015 Winter;67(1):85-93. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2014-13O. Physiother Can. 2015. PMID: 25931658 Free PMC article.
-
Poor Performance Status Is Associated With Increased Mortality in Patients With Cirrhosis.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Aug;14(8):1189-1195.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.03.036. Epub 2016 Apr 1. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016. PMID: 27046483 Free PMC article.
-
Time since primary transplant and poor functional status predict survival after redo lung transplant.J Thorac Dis. 2022 Oct;14(10):3819-3830. doi: 10.21037/jtd-22-334. J Thorac Dis. 2022. PMID: 36389317 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials