Anaerobic testing using the Wingate and Evans-Quinney protocols with and without toe stirrups
- PMID: 6705122
Anaerobic testing using the Wingate and Evans-Quinney protocols with and without toe stirrups
Abstract
Recently, considerable attention has been focused on the measurement of maximal anaerobic power. The Evans-Quinney (1981) protocol which considers leg volume as well as body weight in establishing optimal load settings on the bicycle ergometer has been shown to result in significantly higher anaerobic power outputs than the body weight-relative Wingate protocol. The purpose of this investigation was to compare the anaerobic power outputs during bicycle ergometer work using the Wingate and Evans-Quinney protocols with and without toe stirrups. Fifty male physical education and varsity athletes (average age 22.6 years) volunteered to participate in this experiment. All subjects performed a total of four maximal 30-second anaerobic power tests utilizing the force settings established by the Wingate (load [L] = 0.075 kp/kg body weight) and Evans-Quinney (L = -0.4914-0.2151 (weight, kg) + 2.1124 (leg volume, litre) protocol. The subjects were randomly assigned to one of four counterbalanced orders of test administration. Analysis of data indicated significant differences (P less than or equal to .05) among the variables of: 5-second peak power (W), 30-second anaerobic capacity (W) and percent fatigue as a function of test protocol. Significantly higher values were obtained for all variables under the Evans-Quinney test procedure using toe stirrups while the Wingate test procedure without toe stirrups showed significantly lower values for all variables. It was concluded that the Evans-Quinney load setting protocol with toe stirrups resulted in significantly higher power measures than any of the other treatments tested.
Similar articles
-
Assessment of peak power and short-term work capacity.Eur J Appl Physiol. 2003 Feb;88(6):572-9. doi: 10.1007/s00421-002-0742-x. Epub 2002 Nov 29. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2003. PMID: 12560957 Clinical Trial.
-
Maximal power outputs during the Wingate anaerobic test.Int J Sports Med. 1985 Apr;6(2):82-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1025818. Int J Sports Med. 1985. PMID: 4008145 Clinical Trial.
-
Determination of resistance settings for anaerobic power testing.Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1981 Jun;6(2):53-6. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1981. PMID: 7237675
-
Standard anaerobic exercise tests.Sports Med. 1987 Jul-Aug;4(4):268-89. doi: 10.2165/00007256-198704040-00004. Sports Med. 1987. PMID: 3306867 Review.
-
The measurement of maximal (anaerobic) power output on a cycle ergometer: a critical review.Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:589361. doi: 10.1155/2013/589361. Epub 2013 Aug 29. Biomed Res Int. 2013. PMID: 24073413 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The Test-Retest Reliability of New Generation Power Indices of Wingate All-Out Test.Sports (Basel). 2018 Apr 7;6(2):31. doi: 10.3390/sports6020031. Sports (Basel). 2018. PMID: 29910335 Free PMC article.
-
Physiology of ice hockey.Sports Med. 1988 Feb;5(2):99-126. doi: 10.2165/00007256-198805020-00003. Sports Med. 1988. PMID: 3281210 Review.
-
The Wingate anaerobic test. An update on methodology, reliability and validity.Sports Med. 1987 Nov-Dec;4(6):381-94. doi: 10.2165/00007256-198704060-00001. Sports Med. 1987. PMID: 3324256 Review. No abstract available.
-
Familiarization Effects of an Elliptical All-out Test and the Wingate Test Based on Mechanical Power Indices.J Sports Sci Med. 2013 Sep 1;12(3):521-5. eCollection 2013. J Sports Sci Med. 2013. PMID: 24149160 Free PMC article.
-
An investigation into the associations between psychological skills, anaerobic fitness, and aerobic fitness in elite Iranian taekwondo athletes.PLoS One. 2023 Jul 7;18(7):e0288227. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288227. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37418479 Free PMC article.