A six-year follow-up of infected total hip replacements managed by Girdlestone's arthroplasty

Abstract

Thirty-three Girdlestone's arthroplasties used to salvage infected total hip replacements were followed for a mean of 6.2 years to assess the efficacy of this procedure. Subjective and objective assessment was obtained at the time of review. Gram-negative organisms, retained cement, bony sequestra and secondary healing were common features of the five patients (15%) whose wounds discharged for more than four weeks after operation. Girdlestone's arthroplasty provided satisfactory pain relief in 91% of patients, and control of infection in 97%. Although leg-length discrepancy (mean 4 cm) and a Trendelenburg gait made walking difficult and tiring , 42% were satisfied with their functional ability; 85% needed walking aids, and 3 patients could not walk at all and were confined to bed or a chair. Overall, 79% were satisfied. Objectively, the mean Harris hip rating was 60; however, if patients with multiple joint problems were excluded, this score increased to 77. Girdlestone's arthroplasty seems a reasonable salvage procedure in the management of an infected total hip replacement and the results seem to improve with time.