Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1982 Sep;16(3):525-30.
doi: 10.1128/jcm.16.3.525-530.1982.

Clinical laboratory comparison of a slide blood culture system with a conventional broth system

Comparative Study

Clinical laboratory comparison of a slide blood culture system with a conventional broth system

M A Pfaller et al. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Sep.

Abstract

The recovery of bacteria and fungi from blood cultures was compared in conventional tryptic soy broth (TSB) bottles and in TSB bottles with an agarcoated slide attachment. A total of 2,662 sets of blood cultures, including 413 that were positive (15.5%), were evaluated. Significantly more gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria were recovered in the slide culture bottles than in conventional bottles (299 versus 253 isolates). Growth of gram-positive organisms and fungi was detected in the slide culture bottles 24 to 48 h earlier than in the TSB bottles. In addition, 76% of the isolates in the slide culture system were detected on the agar slide. In comparison, only 40% of the isolates in the TSB bottles were detected initially by blind subculturing. The incidences of contamination were 2.7% (71 cultures) for the slide culture system and 1.5% (39 cultures) for the TSB bottles.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mayo Clin Proc. 1975 Feb;50(2):91-8 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1975 Mar;1(3):309-10 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1978 Oct;8(4):427-30 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1978 Oct;8(4):469-70 - PubMed
    1. Med Welt. 1979 Feb 2;30(5):173-6 - PubMed

Publication types