Ionizing radiation and its risks
Abstract
Penetrating ionizing radiation fairly uniformly puts all exposed molecules and cells at approximately equal risk for deleterious consequences. Thus, the original deposition of radiation energy (that is, the dose) is unaltered by metabolic characteristics of cells and tissue, unlike the situation for chemical agents. Intensely ionizing radiations, such as neutrons and alpha particles, are up to ten times more damaging than sparsely ionizing sources such as x-rays or gamma rays for equivalent doses. Furthermore, repair in cells and tissues can ameliorate the consequences of radiation doses delivered at lower rates by up to a factor of ten compared with comparable doses acutely delivered, especially for somatic (carcinogenic) and genetic effects from x- and gamma-irradiation exposure. Studies on irradiated laboratory animals or on people following occupational, medical or accidental exposures point to an average lifetime fatal cancer risk of about 1 x 10(-4) per rem of dose (100 per 10(6) person-rem). Leukemia and lung, breast and thyroid cancer seem more likely than other types of cancer to be produced by radiation. Radiation exposures from natural sources (cosmic rays and terrestrial radioactivity) of about 0.1 rem per year yield a lifetime cancer risk about 0.1 percent of the normally occurring 20 percent risk of cancer death. An increase of about 1 percent per rem in fatal cancer risk, or 200 rem to double the "background" risk rate, is compared with an estimate of about 100 rem to double the genetic risk. Newer data suggest that the risks for low-level radiation are lower than risks estimated from data from high exposures and that the present 5 rem per year limit for workers is adequate.
Similar articles
-
Saving lives and changing family histories: appropriate counseling of pregnant women and men and women of reproductive age, concerning the risk of diagnostic radiation exposures during and before pregnancy.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jan;200(1):4-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.06.032. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009. PMID: 19121655 Review.
-
Concerning the health effects of internally deposited radionuclides.Health Phys. 2010 Mar;98(3):515-36. doi: 10.1097/HP.0b013e3181c20e25. Health Phys. 2010. PMID: 20147792
-
The effects of embryonic and fetal exposure to x-ray, microwaves, and ultrasound.Clin Perinatol. 1986 Sep;13(3):615-48. Clin Perinatol. 1986. PMID: 3533368 Review.
-
Quantitative comparisons of cancer induction in humans by internally deposited radionuclides and external radiation.Int J Radiat Biol. 2003 Jan;79(1):1-13. Int J Radiat Biol. 2003. PMID: 12556326 Review.
-
Radiation in the workplace-a review of studies of the risks of occupational exposure to ionising radiation.J Radiol Prot. 2009 Jun;29(2A):A61-79. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/29/2A/S05. Epub 2009 May 19. J Radiol Prot. 2009. PMID: 19454806 Review.
Cited by
-
Radiation exposure of patients during endourological procedures.World J Urol. 2024 Apr 27;42(1):266. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04953-y. World J Urol. 2024. PMID: 38676726
-
Effects of irradiation on tumor cell survival, invasion and angiogenesis.J Neurooncol. 2010 Dec;100(3):323-38. doi: 10.1007/s11060-010-0199-4. Epub 2010 May 7. J Neurooncol. 2010. PMID: 20449629 Review.
-
Dose-response effect of human equivalent radiation in the mandible.J Craniofac Surg. 2013 Sep;24(5):1593-8. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31826cfeea. J Craniofac Surg. 2013. PMID: 24036733 Free PMC article.
-
The Gofman-Tamplin Cancer Risk Controversy and Its Impact on the Creation of BEIR I and the Acceptance of LNT.Med Lav. 2023 Feb 14;114(1):e2023007. doi: 10.23749/mdl.v114i1.14006. Med Lav. 2023. PMID: 36790405 Free PMC article.
-
The Russian radiation legacy: its integrated impact and lessons.Environ Health Perspect. 1997 Dec;105 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):1385-91. doi: 10.1289/ehp.97105s61385. Environ Health Perspect. 1997. PMID: 9467049 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources