Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1982 Dec;10(6):663-74.
doi: 10.1007/BF01062547.

Plasma protein binding of furosemide in kidney transplant patients

Free article

Plasma protein binding of furosemide in kidney transplant patients

D E Smith et al. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1982 Dec.
Free article

Abstract

The present investigation was undertaken in order to determine the in vivo plasma protein binding of furosemide in kidney transplant patients and its possible consequence on furosemide effect. Using an equilibrium dialysis technique, serial plasma samples of furosemide taken after intravenous administration were dialyzed against an equal volume of isotonic Krebs Ringer bicarbonate buffer (pH 7.4). Dialysis was performed at 37 degrees C for 5 hr, and furosemide concentrations (total as well as free) were analyzed by HPLC using fluorescence detection. It was observed that kidney transplant patients on concomitant sulfisoxazole treatment (KT+) had a significantly greater value for percent free of furosemide as compared to transplant patients not on sulfisoxazole (KT-) (4.4 +/- 0.8 for KT+ vs. 1.7 +/- 0.3% for KT-; p less than 0.01) as well as to healthy volunteers (4.4 +/- 0.8 for KT+ vs. 1.2 +/- 0.2% for controls; p less than 0.01). In addition, kidney transplant patients not on concomitant sulfisoxazole treatment had a significantly higher value for percent free of furosemide with respect to healthy volunteers (p less than 0.05). Nonlinear plasma protein binding was also observed for one patient, who had values for percent free of furosemide ranging from 1.3 to 12.9%. However, no significant correlation was found between the fraction of the dose excreted unchanged in the urine and percent free of furosemide.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1978 Jun;23(6):644-50 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1971 Jul 29;285(5):264-7 - PubMed
    1. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1976;1(1):25-35 - PubMed
    1. J Pharm Sci. 1983 Dec;72(12):1442-6 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1978 Dec 1;14(4):237-44 - PubMed

Publication types