Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1980 Feb 1;151(2):275-88.
doi: 10.1084/jem.151.2.275.

Importance of antibodies to the fusion glycoprotein of paramyxoviruses in the prevention of spread of infection

Review

Importance of antibodies to the fusion glycoprotein of paramyxoviruses in the prevention of spread of infection

D C Merz et al. J Exp Med. .

Abstract

The effects of monospecific antibodies to the viral glycoprotein with hemagglutinating and neuraminidase activity (HN) and the viral glycoprotein with membrane-fusing activity (F) of the paramyxovirus simian virus 5 (SV5) on the spread of infection in two cell types have been investigated. In CV-1 cells, infection can spread by either released progeny virus adsorbing to and infecting other cells, or by fusion of an infected cell with an adjacent cell as a result of the cell-fusing activity of the F glycoprotein. In these cells, antibodies specific for the HN glycoprotein prevented the dissemination of infection by released infectious virus, but spread by cell fusion was not inhibited. Antibodies to the F glycoprotein completely prevented the spread of infection in these cells. In Madin-Darby bovine kidney cells, which are relatively resistant to SV5-induced fusion, antibodies to either the HN or F glycoproteins were capable of preventing the dissemination of infection. These results indicate that effective immunological prevention of the spread of paramyxovirus infection requires the presence of antibodies that inactivate the F glycoprotein. This requirement for anti-F antibodies has obvious implications for the design of effective paramyxovirus vaccines and provides an explanation for previous failures of formalin-inactivated paramyxovirus vaccines as well as additional insight into the possible immunopathological mechanisms involved in the atypical and severe infections that have occurred in individuals who received inactivated paramyxovirus vaccines and were subsequently infected by the virus.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Immunol. 1977 Dec;119(6):1882-7 - PubMed
    1. Virology. 1977 Jul 1;80(1):54-66 - PubMed
    1. Virology. 1978 May 1;86(1):254-63 - PubMed
    1. J Gen Virol. 1978 May;39(2):219-29 - PubMed
    1. J Infect Dis. 1978 Nov;138(5):672-6 - PubMed

Publication types