Clinical experience with high frequency jet ventilation

Abstract

High frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) has been used in recent years in some forms of respiratory failure, where the presence of barotrauma limited the application of high peak inspiratory pressure. In the present report, the authors describe the clinical experience with 17 patients, who could not be supported with conventional mechanical support and were placed on HFJV. Rates of 100 breath/min, inspiratory/expiratory ratio of 1:2 and cannula size of 1.06--1.62 mm (18--14) gauge were used. Driving pressure required to maintain a PaCO2 of 40--45 torr was 14--45 psig; however, except in 2 patients who developed hemorrhagic tracheitis with subtotal obstruction of both mainstem bronchi, a driving pressure higher than 27 psig was never required, even when PEEP up to 32 cm H2O was used. Of 17 patients treated, 8 survived. In all cases, alveolar ventilation could be maintained within the desired range with high frequency ventilation, even in those patients who eventually died; mechanical support never provided better oxygenation or alveolar ventilation than high frequency ventilation. Hemodynamic function was essentially unchanged with high frequency ventilation; indeed, in three cases, inotropic support with dopamine could be discontinued after initiation of high frequency ventilation.