Similar articles

• A new approach to drug trials in general practice. Comparison of the antihypertensive efficacy of metoprolol and atenolol.

  Adams-Strump BJ, Hayes J, Barber JH. Adams-Strump BJ, et al. Practitioner. 1980 May;224(1343):541-4. Practitioner. 1980. PMID: 6999485 Clinical Trial. No abstract available.
• Ambulatory blood pressure during once-daily randomised double-blind administration of atenolol, metoprolol, pindolol, and slow-release propranolol.

  Floras JS, Jones JV, Hassan MO, Sleight P. Floras JS, et al. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982 Nov 13;285(6352):1387-92. doi: 10.1136/bmj.285.6352.1387. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982. PMID: 6814568 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
• Atenolol and metoprolol once daily in hypertension.

  Scott AK, Rigby JW, Webster J, Hawksworth GM, Petrie JC, Lovell HG. Scott AK, et al. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982 May 22;284(6328):1514-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.284.6328.1514. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982. PMID: 6805588 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
• β-blockers: a review of their pharmacological and physiological diversity in hypertension.

  Ripley TL, Saseen JJ. Ripley TL, et al. Ann Pharmacother. 2014 Jun;48(6):723-33. doi: 10.1177/1060028013519591. Epub 2014 Mar 31. Ann Pharmacother. 2014. PMID: 24687542 Review.
• [Beta-blockaders in the treatment of hypertension in pregnancy].

  Kawecka-Jaszcz K, Skoczeń M. Kawecka-Jaszcz K, et al. Kardiol Pol. 1985;28(5):334-9. Kardiol Pol. 1985. PMID: 2864465 Review. Polish. No abstract available.