Bacteriological colonisation of uterine cavity: role of tailed intrauterine contraceptive device
- PMID: 6788128
- PMCID: PMC1505233
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.282.6271.1189
Bacteriological colonisation of uterine cavity: role of tailed intrauterine contraceptive device
Abstract
Intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUCDs) are thought to cause pelvic inflammatory disease by allowing vaginal bacteria to pass into the uterus along the tail of the device. In this study the uterine cavities of 22 women using an IUCD were examined by a multiple biopsy technique. All five uteruses with a tailless IUCD were sterile but 15 out of 17 with a tailed device contained bacteria. The bacteria had not reached the fundus and most were commensals. The bacteria were not introduced by insertion of the IUCD as bacteria were present in several cases long after insertion. No differences in bacterial count were found between monofilamentous and multifilamentous devices. Bacteria were cultured from only four devices, which suggested that the bacteria adhere to the endometrium and not to the device. The bacteria in the cavity represent interference by the tail with the protective mechanisms of the uterus, which explains the increase in pelvic inflammatory disease in IUCD users.
Similar articles
-
Influence of removal of intrauterine contraceptive devices on colonisation of the cervix by actinomyces-like organisms.Contraception. 1984 Dec;30(6):535-44. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(84)90003-9. Contraception. 1984. PMID: 6529911
-
In vitro study of the possible role of the intrauterine contraceptive device tail in ascending infection of the genital tract.Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1979 May;86(5):374-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1979.tb10613.x. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1979. PMID: 465385
-
The effect of a copper intra-uterine contraceptive device on the microbial ecology of the female genital tract.J Med Microbiol. 1988 Apr;25(4):245-51. doi: 10.1099/00222615-25-4-245. J Med Microbiol. 1988. PMID: 3357191
-
Association of pelvic inflammatory disease with the intrauterine device.Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1969 Mar;12(1):179-97. doi: 10.1097/00003081-196903000-00010. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1969. PMID: 4894454 Review. No abstract available.
-
Infection risk and intrauterine devices.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(3):246-50. doi: 10.1080/00016340802707473. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009. PMID: 19172421 Review.
Cited by
-
Lippes Loop Inserted 45 Years Back: The Dilemma to Remove It or Leave It in situ. A Case Report with Review of Literature.J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Apr;9(4):QE01-5. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/12981.5832. Epub 2015 Apr 1. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015. PMID: 26023607 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Review: Microbial colonization of prosthetic devices.Microb Ecol. 1987 May;13(3):173-91. doi: 10.1007/BF02024996. Microb Ecol. 1987. PMID: 24213294
-
Why Does Your Uterus Become Malignant? The Impact of the Microbiome on Endometrial Carcinogenesis.Life (Basel). 2023 Nov 28;13(12):2269. doi: 10.3390/life13122269. Life (Basel). 2023. PMID: 38137870 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Bacterial colonization of intrauterine devices (IUDs).Arch Gynecol. 1986;239(1):31-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02134286. Arch Gynecol. 1986. PMID: 3740963
-
Risks of intrauterine contraceptive devices.Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 May 26;288(6430):1554-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.288.6430.1554. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984. PMID: 6426640 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources