Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1981 Jul;44(1):24-34.
doi: 10.1038/bjc.1981.143.

Initiation and promotion at different ages and doses in 2200 mice. III. Linear extrapolation from high doses may underestimate low-dose tumour risks

Free PMC article

Initiation and promotion at different ages and doses in 2200 mice. III. Linear extrapolation from high doses may underestimate low-dose tumour risks

F Stenbäck et al. Br J Cancer. 1981 Jul.
Free PMC article

Abstract

The dose-response relationships from the data described in Paper I were analysed. Among unpromoted animals, only doses sufficient to cause ulceration with subsequent promotion due to wound healing caused a rapid crop of tumours, so the dose-response curve exhibited strong upward curvature. Among promoted animals, the response of the skin to initiation appeared to have been nearly saturated by all DMBA doses tested, so that a 30-fold decrease in dose produced only a 3-fold decrease in effect. The dose-response relationship thus exhibited strong downward curvature. Among promoted animals, estimation of the risks associated with very low doses of carcinogen by linear extrapolation through the origin from the effects of larger doses (which is often assumed to be conservative) would under-estimate the true risks by 10-fold or more. Our results emphasize that whereas linear interpolation from the results of high doses may be reasonable for data on the effects of continuous treatment with non-toxic dose levels of carcinogen, it may be misleading when extrapolating, as here, from the effects of single large doses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1971 Jul;47(1):105-11 - PubMed
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Dec;77(12):7262-6 - PubMed
    1. Carcinogenesis. 1980;1(12):1039-47 - PubMed
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Apr;77(4):2251-4 - PubMed
    1. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1956 Feb;16(4):961-9 - PubMed

Substances