Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1981 Aug;52(2):197-204.
doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(81)90319-4.

The efficacy of several irrigating solutions for endodontics: a scanning electron microscopic study

Comparative Study

The efficacy of several irrigating solutions for endodontics: a scanning electron microscopic study

L B Goldman et al. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1981 Aug.

Abstract

The perforated irrigation needle was used to test a high-volume (20 c.c.) final flush of prepared root canals. Three solutions: TEGO 1 percent, NaOCl 5.25 percent, and REDTA were tested. The roots were split longitudinally and were prepared for examination under the scanning electron microscope immediately after preparation and final flushing. In addition, groups were prepared and flushed in the same manner, but after splitting they were soaked in the respective solutions for 3 hours and then examined. The results indicated that the smeared layer is caused by instrumentation, that it is not removed by TEGO or NaOCl, and that it is removed by REDTA. It may be that the smeared layer is a slurry of dentin filings, since REDTA does not remove soft tissue. All solutions produced a canal quite free of debris; however, none of the tested irrigants was completely satisfactory by itself.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms