Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1982;76(2):149-56.
doi: 10.1007/BF00435269.

The role of fentanyl training dose and of the alternative stimulus condition in drug generalization

The role of fentanyl training dose and of the alternative stimulus condition in drug generalization

W Koek et al. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1982.

Abstract

Different groups of rats were trained to discriminate fentanyl (F) (0.03, 0.02, or 0.01 mg/kg) from saline or to discriminate 0.03 mg/kg fentanyl (F) from alternative stimulus conditions (saline, 0.15 mg/kg nicotine, or 0.01 mg/kg F). When percentage of responses on the drug lever and percentage of time spent responding on the drug lever were used as dependent variables, it was found that training dose and alternative stimulus condition both affected the ED50 and the slope of the F generalization gradient. ED50 and slope values based on group data were not significantly different from values based on individual data. Differences between from values based on individual data. Differences between the results of the first and second 2.5-min period of the extinction test were not significant. ED50 and slope values were unaffected by the preceding training session, except in the group trained to discriminate 0.03 from 0.01 mg/kg F. A lever selection measure showed a significant effect of alternative stimulus condition on ED50 values only. Training dose and alternative stimulus condition also affected the generalization to morphine. Under none of the conditions explored in this study did generalization occur to amphetamine or nicotine. The results are discussed in terms of the relative nature of drug generalization.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Psychopharmacologia. 1976 Mar 16;46(2):169-77 - PubMed
    1. Fed Proc. 1974 Jul;33(7):1800-13 - PubMed
    1. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1980 Mar;212(3):474-80 - PubMed
    1. Psychopharmacologia. 1975 Sep 17;43(3):229-32 - PubMed
    1. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1978 Jul 19;58(3):271-5 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources