Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1982 May 22;284(6328):1526-8.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.284.6328.1526.

Evaluation of digitalis in cardiac failure

Comparative Study

Evaluation of digitalis in cardiac failure

R G Murray et al. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). .

Abstract

Ten patients in sinus rhythm with symptomatic cardiac failure participated in a study investigating the value of digitalis at rest and during dynamic exercise. A haemodynamic profile and left ventricular ejection fraction were measured before treatment, after intravenous ouabain, and after six weeks of maintenance treatment with digoxin. There was no significant change in the haemodynamic profile or in the left ventricular ejection fraction at rest after either glycoside. During exercise there was a significant reduction in left ventricular filling pressure from 39 +/- 3 mm Hg to 34 +/- 3 mm Hg (p less than 0.05) after ouabain and to 33 +/- 3 mm Hg (p less than 0.02) after digoxin. Cardiac index improved from 33 +/- 0.3 1/min/m2 to 4.0 +/- 0.4 l/min/m2 (p less than 0.01) after ouabain and to 3.8 +/- 0.4 l/min/m2 (p less than 0.01) after digoxin. During exercise stroke volume index and stroke work index also improved significantly with both glycosides. This was accompanied by an increase in left ventricular ejection fraction from 29 +/- 2% to 36 +/- 3% (p less than 0.05) after ouabain and digoxin. In this study both intravenous ouabain and maintenance treatment with oral digoxin exerted a modest positive inotropic effect in patients with cardiac failure in sinus rhythm. The haemodynamic benefit, however, was manifest only during exertion.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Br Med J. 1977 Mar 19;1(6063):749-52 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Invest. 1948 Sep;27(5):588-99 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Invest. 1964 Mar;43:532-43 - PubMed
    1. Circ Res. 1963 Jun;12:597-610 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J. 1970 Jun 20;2(5711):705-6 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources