Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1982 Jul 17;285(6336):162-6.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.285.6336.162.

Cyclosporin A as prophylaxis against graft-versus-host disease in 36 patients

Cyclosporin A as prophylaxis against graft-versus-host disease in 36 patients

A J Barrett et al. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). .

Abstract

Oral cyclosporin A was used as prophylaxis against graft-versus-host disease in (a) 31 patients with acute leukaemia or aplastic anaemia given transplants of HLA-matched bone marrow and (b) five patients with inborn errors of metabolism given transplants of haplotype-identical (parental) bone marrow. Twenty-six patients survived longer than two months after the operation. Despite the cyclosporin A, 31 patients (86%) suffered an acute form of graft-versus-host disease and 22 (61%) a chronic form. Nevertheless, the disease was usually treatable with immunosuppressive agents and caused the death of only one patient. Cyclosporin A caused renal toxicity in all cases; occasionally this was associated with a "capillary leak" syndrome, fatal in two patients. In children hypertension, fits, and fluid retention were common side effects. Blood concentrations of cyclosporin A correlated with blood urea values and blood pressure but did not predict the occurrence of graft-versus-host disease. Four different dose schedules were used to find the optimum way to administer this drug. Oral cyclosporin A is extremely effective at reducing the severity of graft-versus-host disease, but prevention of the disease is limited by toxicity of the drug and variable absorption. Better results might be achieved with parenteral administration or by using the drug in combination with other methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Transplant Proc. 1974 Dec;6(4):367-71 - PubMed
    1. Br J Dermatol. 1975 Dec;93(6):675-81 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1978 Dec 23-30;2(8104-5):1327-31 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1980 Feb 16;1(8164):327-9 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 1981 Apr 30;290(5809):792-4 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources