Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1982 May;15(5):860-4.
doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.5.860-864.1982.

Comparison of recovery of organisms from blood cultures diluted 10% (volume/volume) and 20% (volume/volume)

Comparative Study

Comparison of recovery of organisms from blood cultures diluted 10% (volume/volume) and 20% (volume/volume)

R Auckenthaler et al. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 May.

Abstract

We compared blood cultures that were diluted 1:5 (20%, vol/vol) and 1:10 (10%, vol/vol) and contained specimens from patients with suspected septicemia. Streptococcus pneumoniae was recovered significantly more frequently from blood cultures diluted 20%, whereas gram-negative bacilli, group D streptococci, Staphylococcus aureus, and Candida spp. were recovered significantly sooner and more frequently from blood cultures diluted 10%. Statistically significant differences in isolation rates, however, represented only a small number of patients for whom the positive cultures affected therapy. We conclude that as long as at least two separate sets of blood cultures are obtained per septic episode from each patient, a 1:5 to 1:10 blood/vented (aerobic) medium ratio provides acceptable results. Nevertheless, the results also demonstrate that blood cultures diluted 10% provided greater and faster yields than those provided by blood cultures diluted 20%.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Appl Microbiol. 1969 Jun;17(6):839-42 - PubMed
    1. J Bacteriol. 1976 May;126(2):969-76 - PubMed
    1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Oct;10(4):697-706 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1978 Sep;8(3):299-301 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Feb;9(2):248-52 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms