Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1982 Aug 14;285(6340):469-71.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.285.6340.469.

Sphygmomanometers in hospital and family practice: problems and recommendations

Sphygmomanometers in hospital and family practice: problems and recommendations

M J Burke et al. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). .

Abstract

The accuracy and working condition of 210 sphygmomanometers were tested: 100 (50 and mercury and 50 aneroid) models were used in family practices and 100 mercury models in hospitals. Faults in the inflation-deflation system were common and caused mainly by dirt or wear in the control valves. Leakage occurred in 48% of the hospital and 33% of the family practice sphygmomanometers. In the mercury models the mercury or air vents were often in an unsatisfactory condition or the calibrated glass tube dirty. The accuracy of the gauges was examined at 90 and 150 mm Hg: fewer than 2% of the mercury sphygmomanometers but 30% of the aneroid models had errors greater than +/- 4 mm Hg at either pressure. Over half of the cuffs examined had bladders widths less than the recommended size, and 94% had bladders shorter than the length recommended for use on normal adults. Mercury sphygmomanometers should be bought in preference to aneroid models as they are more accurate, less expensive in the long term, and can be maintained by the owner; they should be checked every six to 12 months depending on usage. Replacement parts should be kept readily available.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. JAMA. 1969 Sep 22;209(12):1902-4 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J. 1976 Apr 10;1(6014):886-8 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J. 1979 Mar 24;1(6166):789-90 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J. 1979 Oct 6;2(6194):851-3 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1981 May 2;1(8227):1005 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources