Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1983 Mar;1(3):887-92.
doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(83)80204-6.

Right bundle branch block: long-term prognosis in apparently healthy men

Free article
Comparative Study

Right bundle branch block: long-term prognosis in apparently healthy men

J L Fleg et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1983 Mar.
Free article

Abstract

The long-term cardiac prognosis of 24 clinically healthy men with complete right bundle branch block, identified from the 1,142 men constituting the population of the Baltimore Longitudinal Study on Aging, was assessed over a follow-up period averaging 8.4 years. When compared with a control group matched for age at which right bundle branch block appeared (mean +/- standard deviation 64.0 +/- 13.5 years), men with right bundle branch block showed no difference in the prevalence of antecedent coronary risk factors or obstructive lung disease. The incidence of angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, valvular heart disease, cardiomegaly, congestive heart failure, advanced heart block or cardiac death in these men did not differ from that of the control group over the observation period. Furthermore, at the latest follow-up study, maximal aerobic exercise tolerance and chronotropic response to maximal exercise were not impaired in men with right bundle branch block relative to control men (9.1 +/- 2.2 versus 7.3 +/- 3.0 minutes and 150.3 +/- 23.5 versus 147.7 +/- 20.7 beats/minute, respectively). However, axis deviation leftward of -30 degrees was present in 46% of men with right bundle branch block but in only 15% of control subjects at latest follow-up (probability [p] less than 0.01). Although the PR interval lengthened by 40 ms or more developed in only 6% of control subjects over the observation period, such prolongation occurred in 29% of men with right bundle branch block (p less than 0.05). These results support the concept that right bundle branch block in these asymptomatic men is a manifestation of a primary abnormality of the cardiac conduction system but has no demonstrable adverse effect on long-term cardiac morbidity or mortality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources