Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1983 Mar;3(5):328-31.
doi: 10.1002/cyto.990030504.

Standardization of high-resolution flow cytometric DNA analysis by the simultaneous use of chicken and trout red blood cells as internal reference standards

Free article

Standardization of high-resolution flow cytometric DNA analysis by the simultaneous use of chicken and trout red blood cells as internal reference standards

L L Vindeløv et al. Cytometry. 1983 Mar.
Free article

Abstract

Determination of nuclear DNA content by flow cytometry requires comparison with a reference standard. The use of external standards such as lymphocytes or granulocytes is time-consuming and inaccurate. Chicken red blood cells (CRBC) have a DNA content of 35% of the human diploid value and have been widely used as internal standard. The ratio calculated on the basis of the peak channel numbers of the standard and the sample and used to indicate the DNA content (DNA ratio) is, however, very sensitive to changes in the zero level adjustment of the flow cytometer. If two internal standards are used the DNA ratio becomes independent of the zero level. Rainbow trout red blood cells (TRBC) have a DNA content of 80% of human diploid cells. A mixture of CRBC and TRBC was prepared and stored in small aliquots at -80 degrees C. This mixture was added to the sample before staining. The day-to-day variation of the DNA ratio obtained by use of the two standards was smaller than that obtained by CRBC alone. The possibility of sex related differences in DNA content of CRBC and TRBC was examined. The results indicated that a new batch of standards should be tested against the old batch to avoid the introduction of a systematic error.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources