Electrophysiologic testing in the management of survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Abstract

Forty-five patients survived a cardiac arrest due to ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF). Programmed ventricular stimulation was performed with the patients taking no antiarrhythmic medications. Sustained VT was induced in 26 patients (58%) and nonsustained VT in 8 (18%). With treatment aimed at the underlying heart disease (plus empiric antiarrhythmic therapy in 2 patients), the 11 patients who had no inducible VT have had no recurrence of symptomatic VT or cardiac arrest over a follow-up period of 19 +/- 9 months (mean +/- standard deviation). Conventional antiarrhythmic drugs suppressed the induction of VT and were used for chronic treatment in 9 of 34 patients (26%) with inducible VT. Three of these 9 patients had recurrent VT or sudden death, whereas 6 have had no recurrence over follow-up of 20 +/- 7 months. In the 25 of 34 patients in whom the induction of VT was not suppressed by conventional antiarrhythmic drugs, 23 were treated with amiodarone (daily dose 550 +/- 120 mg), and 2 underwent coronary artery bypass grafting with either aneurysmectomy or map-directed endocardial resection. One of the latter 2 patients died suddenly 12 months after surgery. Among the 23 patients treated with amiodarone, 2 had fatal VT or sudden death and 21 (91%) did not, over 18 +/- 14 months of follow-up. In survivors of a cardiac arrest, the chief value of electrophysiologic testing is in identifying patients without inducible VT, who appear to have a low risk of recurrent sudden death with treatment directed at the underlying heart disease. Serial electropharmacologic testing with conventional antiarrhythmic drugs is disappointing, with a low incidence of arrhythmia suppression.