Microbiological and clinical evaluation of the isolator lysis-centrifugation blood culture tube
- PMID: 6863507
- PMCID: PMC272757
- DOI: 10.1128/jcm.17.5.864-869.1983
Microbiological and clinical evaluation of the isolator lysis-centrifugation blood culture tube
Abstract
In a controlled evaluation of 6,010 blood cultures, the yield of clinically significant microorganisms was greater from a lysis-centrifugation system (Isolator, Du Pont Co.) than from a nonvented vacuum bottle containing tryptic soy broth with sodium polyanetholesulfonate and CO2 and a vented bottle containing biphasic brain heart infusion medium with sodium polyanetholesulfonate. The Isolator significantly increased the frequency of isolation of Staphylococcus aureus and Candida spp. and significantly decreased the time required for the detection of S. aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Candida spp.; however, anaerobic bacteria were recovered significantly more frequently from nonvented bottles with tryptic soy broth, and pneumococci were recovered significantly more frequently from both bottle systems. Contamination of cultures was significantly greater with the Isolator system than with either bottle system. Regardless of the number of blood cultures obtained per septic episode, the Isolator detected microbiologically proven bacteremia or fungemia in a significantly greater number of patients and significantly decreased the time required for detection.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of a lysis-centrifugation and biphasic bottle blood culture system during routine use.J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Sep;18(3):554-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.3.554-557.1983. J Clin Microbiol. 1983. PMID: 6355148 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of lysis-centrifugation with a biphasic blood culture medium for the recovery of aerobic and facultatively anaerobic bacteria.J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Sep;20(3):413-6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.20.3.413-416.1984. J Clin Microbiol. 1984. PMID: 6386858 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical evaluation of lysis-centrifugation technique and a biphasic bottle system for blood culture.Scand J Infect Dis. 1985;17(4):401-6. doi: 10.3109/13813458509058781. Scand J Infect Dis. 1985. PMID: 4089545
-
Comparison of the Roche Septi-Chek blood culture bottle with a brain heart infusion biphasic medium bottle and with a tryptic soy broth bottle.J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Mar;19(3):315-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.19.3.315-317.1984. J Clin Microbiol. 1984. PMID: 6371039 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of the resin blood culture medium on the treatment of critically ill patients.Crit Care Med. 1996 May;24(5):797-801. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199605000-00012. Crit Care Med. 1996. PMID: 8706456 Review.
Cited by
-
Current controversies in the detection of septicemia.Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Oct;5(5):487-91. doi: 10.1007/BF02017688. Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1986. PMID: 3536496 Review. No abstract available.
-
Blood cultures: an overview.Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1989 Sep;8(9):803-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02185852. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1989. PMID: 2512154 Review. No abstract available.
-
Controlled comparison of BacT/ALERT FAN aerobic medium and BATEC fungal blood culture medium for detection of fungemia.J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Feb;39(2):622-4. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.2.622-624.2001. J Clin Microbiol. 2001. PMID: 11158118 Free PMC article.
-
Isolation of Bartonella (Rochalimaea) henselae: effects of methods of blood collection and handling.J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Mar;35(3):544-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.3.544-547.1997. J Clin Microbiol. 1997. PMID: 9041385 Free PMC article.
-
Pathogenesis of Gram-Negative Bacteremia.Clin Microbiol Rev. 2021 Mar 10;34(2):e00234-20. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00234-20. Print 2021 Jun 16. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2021. PMID: 33692149 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous