Amplification bandwidth and intelligibility of speech in quiet and noise for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss
- PMID: 6870667
- DOI: 10.3109/00206098309072789
Amplification bandwidth and intelligibility of speech in quiet and noise for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss
Abstract
The intelligibility of speech mixed with noise (+6 dB S/N) and in quiet was measured as a function of its audible bandwidth for 7 listeners with moderate sensorineural hearing losses. Words were presented at three levels in the field (50, 60 and 70 dB SPL) and amplified with a Limiting Master Hearing Aid (LMHA) which allows independent control of gain and maximum power output in each of nine, half-octave channels. The frequency gain characteristics were chosen so the speech spectrum (60 dB SPL) at the input was shaped to approximate the individual listener's contour of most comfortable listening levels at the output. At each level and for the words in noise as well as quiet, the LMHA was set for four bandwidths (266-6 000, 375-4 242, 530-3 000 and 750-2 121 Hz). For these conditions, the listeners all obtained the highest mean score with the LMHA set for the widest bandwidth. The listener's ability to understand the words, after adjustment for individual differences, was well correlated (0.77-0.91) with the articulation index. Preliminary observations on the acceptability of amplified sounds, that is, loud speech, impact noise, an air-horn blast, and a party ratchet, are included.
Similar articles
-
Amplification bandwidth and speech intelligibility for two listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.Audiology. 1982;21(3):251-68. doi: 10.3109/00206098209072743. Audiology. 1982. PMID: 7092728
-
Speech intelligibility benefits of hearing AIDS at various input levels.J Am Acad Audiol. 2015 Mar;26(3):275-88. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.26.3.7. J Am Acad Audiol. 2015. PMID: 25751695
-
A comparison of gain for adults from generic hearing aid prescriptive methods: impacts on predicted loudness, frequency bandwidth, and speech intelligibility.J Am Acad Audiol. 2011 Jul-Aug;22(7):441-59. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.22.7.5. J Am Acad Audiol. 2011. PMID: 21993050
-
Loudness summation of equal loud narrowband signals in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.Int J Audiol. 2018 Jun;57(sup3):S71-S80. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1380848. Epub 2017 Oct 3. Int J Audiol. 2018. PMID: 28971746
-
Intelligibility of conversational and clear speech in noise and reverberation for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.J Acoust Soc Am. 1994 Mar;95(3):1581-92. doi: 10.1121/1.408545. J Acoust Soc Am. 1994. PMID: 8176061
Cited by
-
Curriculum for graduate courses in amplification.Trends Amplif. 1998 Mar;3(1):6-44. doi: 10.1177/108471389800300102. Trends Amplif. 1998. PMID: 25425878 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Spectro-temporal characteristics of speech at high frequencies, and the potential for restoration of audibility to people with mild-to-moderate hearing loss.Ear Hear. 2008 Dec;29(6):907-22. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31818246f6. Ear Hear. 2008. PMID: 18685497 Free PMC article.
-
Within-consonant perceptual differences in the hearing impaired ear.J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Jul;134(1):607-17. doi: 10.1121/1.4807474. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013. PMID: 23862835 Free PMC article.
-
Cochlear dead regions in typical hearing aid candidates: prevalence and implications for use of high-frequency speech cues.Ear Hear. 2011 May-Jun;32(3):339-48. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318202e982. Ear Hear. 2011. PMID: 21522068 Free PMC article.
-
Dead regions in the cochlea: diagnosis, perceptual consequences, and implications for the fitting of hearing AIDS.Trends Amplif. 2001 Mar;5(1):1-34. doi: 10.1177/108471380100500102. Trends Amplif. 2001. PMID: 25425895 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous