Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1983 Apr:337:69-87.
doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014612.

Influence of luminance gradient reversal on simple cells in feline striate cortex

Influence of luminance gradient reversal on simple cells in feline striate cortex

P Hammond et al. J Physiol. 1983 Apr.

Abstract

1. The sensitivity of simple cells to luminance gradient reversal in bar stimuli has been investigated in the striate cortex of lightly anaesthetized cats.2. The influence of segment(s) of one polarity of contrast, partially masking or added end-on to a bar of reversed contrast, was assessed against a stationary textured background (of intermediate average luminance), which was itself without influence on cell behaviour.3. In either configuration, short segments of reversed contrast were suppressive of bar response, to an extent varying with location along the receptive-field axis, but much greater than predictable from length-summation characteristics. Response suppression, even by very short segments, was often total.4. The effects of longer segments, added end-on to a bar of opposite contrast, depended on the extent of length summation exhibited by each cell. With progressive extension of these segments, some recovery of response occurred in a few simple cells with larger receptive fields, but not in small-field simple cells. The behaviour of end-stopped simple cells was comparable in all respects to that of their end-free counterparts, within the length-summation zone; thereafter, invasion of the inhibitory end-zones by bars of either polarity elicited a generalized decline in response.5. Where responsiveness was restored by adding longer segments of opposite polarity, the response peak shifted to the discharge centre appropriate to that polarity.6. All these results were found with either polarity of contrast, i.e. a light bar plus dark segments or the converse.7. Similar results were obtained for motion in either direction across the receptive field; and also for flash-presentation, over either the centre or flanks (whether ;on' or ;off') of the receptive field.8. The effectiveness of contrasting added segments was assessed as a function of location along the receptive-field axis for flash-presented and for moving stimuli. Suppressive effects were greatest over the centre of the receptive field, declining progressively in either direction along its axis, but over greater distances than anticipated from length summation.9. None of the results presented could have been predicted from length-summation characteristics. They are strongly suggestive of gating, rather than linear, antagonistic interactions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Vision Res. 1967 Jan;7(1):107-10 - PubMed
    1. J Physiol. 1971 Dec;219(3):625-57 - PubMed
    1. Invest Ophthalmol. 1972 May;11(5):346-54 - PubMed
    1. J Neurophysiol. 1974 Nov;37(6):1394-409 - PubMed
    1. J Physiol. 1977 Mar;266(1):94P - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources