Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1978 Jun;3(2):105-32.
doi: 10.1007/BF00998897.

A comparison of the mechanisms and some properties of instructed sudomotor and cardiac control

Comparative Study

A comparison of the mechanisms and some properties of instructed sudomotor and cardiac control

J M Lacroix et al. Biofeedback Self Regul. 1978 Jun.

Abstract

Instructed control defined as differential compliance with verbal instructions to increase and decrease a response was assessed when a change in sudomotor activation or heart rate was specified as the behavioral goal. Instructed control of heart rate was evident prior to explicit feedback training for this response, but instructed control of sudomotor activation defined as finger sweating and measured as skin conductance was not. Feedback training subsequently established instructed control of sudomotor responding, but such training did not lead to a significant improvement in control of heart rate. Explicit strategy suggestions emphasizing emotional responding and intended or actual movement appeared to interfere with the performance of instructed control under both target conditions. Instructed changes in heart rate were attended by correlated changes in somatomotor and respiratory function. Somatomotor and respiratory responses were also observed when subjects were instructed to change sudomotor activation, but these correlated activities were of small magnitude and were not augmented by feedback training as was target responding. Several accounts of the basis for differences that were evident between the target conditions with respect to feedback effects and response patterns are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Biofeedback Self Regul. 1977 Dec;2(4):393-406 - PubMed
    1. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1971 Dec;77(3):495-512 - PubMed
    1. Psychophysiology. 1975 Jul;12(4):445-55 - PubMed
    1. Psychophysiology. 1976 Sep;13(5):378-85 - PubMed
    1. J Gen Psychol. 1972 Oct;87(2d half):195-202 - PubMed

Publication types