Similar articles

• [Morphological studies on the bimaxillary protrusion patients. Part 3. Angle Class III malocclusion comparatively analyzed with Class I and Class II patients (author's transl)].

  Iwasawa T, Shimizu N, Yamauchi E, Yamada W, Fujiwara K. Iwasawa T, et al. Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi. 1980 Jun;39(2):176-85. Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi. 1980. PMID: 6935310 Japanese. No abstract available.
• [Morphological studies on the bimaxillary protrusion patients. Part 1. On Angle Class I malocclusion (author's transl)].

  Iwasawa T, Yamazaki T, Kawasaki H, Ohkawa S, Mimori M. Iwasawa T, et al. Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi. 1980 Jun;39(2):157-66. Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi. 1980. PMID: 6935308 Japanese. No abstract available.
• [Morphological variation of Angle class II division 2 in Japanese male adults (author's transl)].

  Deguchi T, Togari A, Matsui K, Ozawa M, Teramachi K, Matsuda Y. Deguchi T, et al. Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi. 1981 Sep;40(3):300-7. Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi. 1981. PMID: 6947032 Japanese. No abstract available.
• Components of class II malocclusion in children 8-10 years of age.

  McNamara JA Jr. McNamara JA Jr. Angle Orthod. 1981 Jul;51(3):177-202. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1981)051<0177:COCIMI>2.0.CO;2. Angle Orthod. 1981. PMID: 7023290 Review. No abstract available.
• Class II malocclusion: mandibular retrusion or maxillary protrusion?

  Rosenblum RE. Rosenblum RE. Angle Orthod. 1995;65(1):49-62. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1995)065<0049:CIMMRO>2.0.CO;2. Angle Orthod. 1995. PMID: 7726463 Review.