Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1981 Apr;1(4):336-46.
doi: 10.1128/mcb.1.4.336-346.1981.

Segregation of recessive phenotypes in somatic cell hybrids: role of mitotic recombination, gene inactivation, and chromosome nondisjunction

Affiliations

Segregation of recessive phenotypes in somatic cell hybrids: role of mitotic recombination, gene inactivation, and chromosome nondisjunction

C E Campbell et al. Mol Cell Biol. 1981 Apr.

Abstract

Somatic cell hybrids heterozygous at the emetine resistance locus (emtr/emt+) or the chromate resistance locus (chrr/chr+) are known to segregate the recessive drug resistance phenotype at high frequency. We have examined mechanisms of segregation in Chinese hamster cell hybrids heterozygous at these two loci, both of which map to the long arm of Chinese hamster chromosome 2. To follow the fate of chromosomal arms through the segregation process, our hybrids were also heterozygous at the mtx (methotrexate resistance) locus on the short arm of chromosome 2 and carried cytogenetically marked chromosomes with either a short-arm deletion (2p-) or a long-arm addition (2q+). Karyotype and phenotype analysis of emetine- or chromate-resistant segregants from such hybrids allowed us to distinguish four potential segregation mechanisms: (i) loss of the emt+- or chr+-bearing chromosome; (ii) mitotic recombination between the centromere and the emt or chr loci, giving rise to homozygous resistant segregants; (iii) inactivation of the emt+ or chr+ alleles; and (iv) loss of the emt+- or chr+-bearing chromosome with duplication of the homologous chromosome carrying the emtr or chrr allele. Of 48 independent segregants examined, only 9 (20%) arose by simple chromosome loss. Two segregants (4%) were consistent with a gene inactivation mechanism, but because of their rarity, other mechanisms such as mutation or submicroscopic deletion could not be excluded. Twenty-one segregants (44%) arose by either mitotic recombination or chromosome loss and duplication; the two mechanisms were not distinguishable in that experiment. Finally, in hybrids allowing these two mechanisms to be distinguished, 15 segregants (31%) arose by chromosome loss and duplication, and none arose by mitotic recombination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Cell Biol. 1980 Dec;87(3 Pt 1):697-702 - PubMed
    1. Methods Enzymol. 1979;58:322-44 - PubMed
    1. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1976;16(1-5):83-91 - PubMed
    1. Nat New Biol. 1972 Nov 8;240(97):50-2 - PubMed
    1. Genetics. 1936 Nov;21(6):625-730 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources